Teams

Underdogs 40+ 4.0

2022 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2021- HSV · 4.0 MEN 40N2S3D

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN 40N2S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Chris Beatty
published 4
3.55
Richard Textor
published
3.43
Jeremy Pope
published
3.40
Gary Stephens
published 3.5
3.39
Scott Gillies
published
3.38
Christopher Chapman
published 3.5
3.36
Jeff Tate
published
3.35
Bryan Henderson
published 3.5
3.30
Dave LaChance
published 3.5
3.26
Stephen Hall
published
3.16
Robert Curtis
published
2.85
Parker Altice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Henderson + Gary Stephens4164% games+8.2% vs expected
Gary Stephens + Christopher Chapman5159% games+4.3% vs expected
Scott Gillies + Christopher Chapman4453% games+4.2% vs expected
Richard Textor + Christopher Chapman11065% games+4.1% vs expected
Dave LaChance + Stephen Hall314 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Tate + Gary Stephens224 matchesnot enough data
Dave LaChance + Scott Gillies303 matchesnot enough data
Dave LaChance + Richard Textor303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Beatty
21W–28L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Richard Textor
71W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
Jeremy Pope
72W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Gary Stephens
51W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Scott Gillies
108W–91L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Christopher Chapman
79W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Jeff Tate
27W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Bryan Henderson
30W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Dave LaChance
63W–26L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Stephen Hall
24W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Robert Curtis
5W–17L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
Parker Altice
54W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.