Teams

Rally Cats 2.5

2023 Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekend Women · SVTA Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.80 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-10vs All About that AceLost 02
L#1 SinglesSarah Midgley vs Kim Hovda3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesIngrid Hunsicker / Jane Kim vs Charlene Sloan / Frankie Smith3-6, 0-6
2023-06-04vs All About that AceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Dudley / Susan Metcalfe vs Chandra Bittner / Joi Ruther2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Jian Wen6-1, 6-3
2023-05-20vs All About that AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Kim / Sarah Midgley vs Christine Cummins / Charlene Sloan6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-19vs All About that AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Kim / Sarah Midgley vs Liliana Michaels / Kate Darne6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-07vs All About that AceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Dudley / Susan Metcalfe vs Chandra Bittner / Janet Bailey4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Jian Wen6-1, 6-1
2023-04-29vs All About that AceLost 02
L#1 DoublesFiona Campbell / Sarah Midgley vs Chandra Bittner / Joi Ruther4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Janet Bailey4-6, 4-6
2023-04-22vs All About that AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Dudley / Susan Metcalfe vs Liliana Michaels / Jian Wen6-1, 6-1
2023-04-16vs All About that AceWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristina White / Sarah Midgley vs Joi Ruther / Chandra Bittner4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Kate Darne6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Dudley / Susan Metcalfe vs Christine Cummins / Frankie Smith6-0, 6-1
2023-04-02vs All About that AceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesErin Clark / Susan Metcalfe vs Janet Bailey / Liliana Michaels6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Midgley vs Kim Hovda3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SVTA Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Fiona Campbell
published
2.84
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.84
Susan Metcalfe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Sarah Midgley
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.30
Susan Dudley
published
2.28
Christina White
published 2.5
Desiree Wing
published 2.5
Mary Ashton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Midgley + Ingrid Hunsicker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fiona Campbell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
111W–174L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Susan Metcalfe
45W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Sarah Midgley
33W–64L career · 6 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
2.60
Susan Dudley
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Christina White
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Desiree Wing
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Ashton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.