Teams

Edmiston/Stewart

Combo · Combo 7.5W

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-17Won 30
W#1 DoublesMandy Weaver / Liz Bates vs Brandi Vincent / Heather Brewer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJessica Theimer / Jessie Hoak vs Vanessa Arredondo / Callie Bryan6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGrace Craft / Lexanne Edmiston vs Lori Dornhecker / Christy Ross6-1, 6-3
2026-08-10vs BrightLost 01
L#1 DoublesShona Ramos / Amy Hill vs Kayla Hubble / Cody Burns2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesKymberli Harper / Amy Hill vs Cindy Byrd / Susan Looka6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 7.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Kymberli Harper
published
3.86
Shona Ramos
published
3.78
Kim Westbrook
published
3.72
Jessica Theimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Miranda Stewart
published
3.61
Lexanne Edmiston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Jessie Hoak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Jaime Anderson
published 3.5
3.31
Amy Hill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Liz Bates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Theimer + Miranda Stewart7065% games+6.2% vs expected
Jessie Hoak + Lexanne Edmiston5550% games+5.7% vs expected
Brenda Carrizales-Adams + Jessie Hoak9165% games+4.7% vs expected
Brenda Carrizales-Adams + Kim Westbrook10557% games+1.1% vs expected
Jessica Theimer + Jessie Hoak5255% games−2.4% vs expected
Kim Westbrook + Lexanne Edmiston9161% gamesnot enough data
Kymberli Harper + Lexanne Edmiston6063% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Theimer + Brenda Carrizales-Adams3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kymberli Harper
37W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
Shona Ramos
92W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
Kim Westbrook
58W–24L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
Jessica Theimer
64W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Brenda Carrizales-Adams
58W–20L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Miranda Stewart
60W–27L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Lexanne Edmiston
57W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Jessie Hoak
72W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Jaime Anderson
34W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Amy Hill
122W–85L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Liz Bates
9W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.