Teams

McMullen Halm

2023 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 M Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-12vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/40&Over3.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Solorzano / Andrew DePasquale vs Zach Seufert / Barry Michael6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-20vs ELW BettencourtWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Paul Solorzano vs Michael Issa / James Bettencourt6-4, 7-5
2023-05-13vs Seminole Lake DsaLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Christopher Patterson vs Carlos Rodriguez / Mark Nasworthy7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-06vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/40&Over3.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Solorzano / Chi Ming Yu vs Zach Seufert / Barry Michael1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-29vs ELW BettencourtWon 10
W#1 DoublesChi Ming Yu / Paul Solorzano vs Jeff Sourini / Michael Issa6-3, 7-6
2023-04-22vs Seminole Lake DsaLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Solorzano / Andrew DePasquale vs Shaji Joseph / Peter Martino4-6, 4-6
2023-04-01vs ELW BettencourtWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Paul Solorzano vs Michael Vanhorenbeck / James Bettencourt6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Johnny Fung
published
3.48
3.45
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.43
Joseph Flaherty
published
3.30
Andrew DePasquale
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
George Hawkins
published 3.5
3.24
YOUNES HAMDI
published
3.00
Paul Solorzano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kyle Robertshaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew DePasquale + Christopher Patterson5158% games+2.9% vs expected
Andrew DePasquale + Paul Solorzano191851% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Johnny Fung
26W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.61
3.5
Edwin Alejandro-Vega
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Brandon Halm
26W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
Joseph Flaherty
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Andrew DePasquale
105W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christopher Patterson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
George Hawkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
YOUNES HAMDI
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Paul Solorzano
69W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Kyle Robertshaw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.