Teams

MTC Britzius 9:30am

2023 Women's Daytime Doubles · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Andrea McHugh
published 4
3.57
Mary Kennedy
published
3.37
Ruth Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 47% · published
3.36
Stephanie Harlan
published
3.35
Lori Wehmann
published
3.29
Devon Diebel
published 3.5
3.27
Anna Rindt
published 3.5
3.25
Ellen Oglesby
published 3.5
3.20
Emily Scherschligt
published 3.5
3.17
Jenny Starkey
published
3.07
Stacy Chillscyzn
published
Lezlie Bork
published
Scott Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Scherschligt + Jenny Starkey5948% games+2.0% vs expected
Devon Diebel + Ellen Oglesby3453% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea McHugh
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
Mary Kennedy
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.57
Ruth Eliason
263W–178L career · 15 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Stephanie Harlan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Lori Wehmann
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Devon Diebel
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Anna Rindt
22W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ellen Oglesby
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Emily Scherschligt
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Jenny Starkey
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.17
Stacy Chillscyzn
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
Lezlie Bork
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Swanson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.