Teams

LCGR- Griffin/Jetton 18+ 7.5

2023 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-19vs LABO-Bonham/NMP 18+ 7.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Samantha Humphreys vs Kathleen Navola / Katherine Dugan6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLauren Hession / Kaylin Scher vs Beth McCarthy / Noreen Soos6-3, 6-4
2023-10-05vs LEKROGSTIE/Westport 7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLeta Wiley / Irma Laney vs Becky Heflin / Katelyn Goodnough6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesClaudia Bareis / Dana Goodrich vs Brenda Levy / Whitney King6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Samantha Humphreys vs Diane Davis / Elizabeth Krogstie3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-03vs LLPA-Pate-/NMPWon 30
W#1 DoublesCortney Griffin / Lauren Hession vs Mary Wilson / Greigh Lucas6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaggie Siebert / Samantha Humphreys vs Emily Heinemann Hamilton / Patty Smith7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClaudia Bareis / Dana Goodrich vs LuAnne Pate / Christine Hardin6-0, 6-0
2023-09-28vs LSOS-Ostapko/SkybrookWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeta Wiley / Susan Davis vs Patricia Baldelli / Stephanie Campbell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Hallman / Samantha Humphreys vs Odette Baker / Lori Fuller6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClaudia Bareis / Karla Williams vs Karen Dziadziola / Julie Phillips6-0, 6-0
2023-09-14vs LABO-Bonham/NMP 18+ 7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesClaudia Bareis / Leta Wiley vs Ellyn Pavelka / Noreen Soos6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Dana Goodrich vs Maria Emilia de la Orden / Cindy Japec5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCortney Griffin / Kelly Hallman vs Susan Lesso / Anna Bonham6-3, 6-4
2023-08-31vs LEKROGSTIE/Westport 7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesLeta Wiley / Lauren Hession vs Angela Stallman / Diane Davis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Davis / Dana Goodrich vs Leila Riccardelli / Becky Heflin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarla Williams / Irma Laney vs Whitney King / Brenda Levy3-6, 4-6
2023-08-24vs LSOS-Ostapko/SkybrookWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeta Wiley / Maggie Siebert vs Lisa Levy / Karen Dziadziola6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKarla Williams / Claudia Bareis vs Gretchen Earnshaw / Julie Bosley6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Kaylin Scher vs Mary Hamilton Chiles / Julie Phillips6-1, 2-1
2023-08-17vs LLPA-Pate-/NMPWon 20
W#2 DoublesLauren Hession / Leta Wiley vs Greigh Lucas / Mary Wilson6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIrma Laney / Karla Williams vs Jennifer Higgins / Emily Heinemann Hamilton6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Dana Goodrich
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Irma Laney
published 4.5
3.92
Kelly Hallman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Maggie Siebert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Stefanie Flippin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Lauren Hession
published
3.69
Leta Wiley
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.38
Kaylin Scher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Karla Williams
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Cortney Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Whitney Brunk
published 3.5
Claudia Bareis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Hallman + Maggie Siebert9357% games+6.0% vs expected
Karla Williams + Cortney Griffin14657% games+1.1% vs expected
Stefanie Flippin + Kelly Hallman181056% games+0.9% vs expected
Cortney Griffin + Kelly Hallman6455% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie Flippin + Cortney Griffin6160% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie Flippin + Maggie Siebert7064% gamesnot enough data
Karla Williams + Stefanie Flippin4252% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Siebert + Leta Wiley4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Goodrich
91W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.33
4.5
Irma Laney
42W–20L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Kelly Hallman
126W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Maggie Siebert
94W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Stefanie Flippin
164W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Lauren Hession
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Leta Wiley
181W–87L career · 11 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Kaylin Scher
50W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Karla Williams
377W–168L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Cortney Griffin
156W–91L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Whitney Brunk
61W–70L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Claudia Bareis
10W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.