Teams

MSIL A55&O 8.0W Fulton/Uphoff-Peoria

2024 Adult 55 & Over - West League · West MSIL A55 & Over 8.0W

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesNancy Brady / Maureen Fulton vs Sharon Jackson / Victoria Coverstone6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKaren Disharoon / Shawn Doscotch vs Sharon Jackson / Victoria Coverstone6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Brady / Stephanie Madix vs Susan Novitsky / Mary Ann Royse4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Brady / Maureen Fulton vs Sharon Jackson / Molly McMahon6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesStephanie Madix / Nancy Brady vs Rebecca Vanmeter / Shelley Tischkau6-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesNancy Brady / Stephanie Madix vs Shelley Tischkau / Susan Novitsky4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShawn Doscotch / Maureen Fulton vs Sharon Jackson / Teri Scaggs4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesStephanie Madix / Nancy Brady vs Teri Scaggs / Lisa Fritscher1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShawn Doscotch / Karen Disharoon vs Molly McMahon / Rebecca Vanmeter7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for West MSIL A55 & Over 8.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Maureen Fulton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Becky Wiese
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.82
Stephanie Madix
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Colleen Curran
published 4
3.69
Lucinda Uphoff
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.38
Shawn Doscotch
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Jodi Scott
published
Karen Disharoon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Brady
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Fulton + Lucinda Uphoff10071% games+9.8% vs expected
Stephanie Madix + Becky Wiese4261% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Madix + Maureen Fulton5162% gamesnot enough data
Becky Wiese + Lucinda Uphoff3350% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Brady + Maureen Fulton303 matchesnot enough data
Lucinda Uphoff + Colleen Curran303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen Fulton
103W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.04
4
Becky Wiese
68W–40L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Stephanie Madix
83W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Colleen Curran
34W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Lucinda Uphoff
213W–48L career · 11 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Shawn Doscotch
42W–25L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
Jodi Scott
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Disharoon
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Brady
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.