Teams

Down the Line*

2026 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - IDAHO FALLS · Mixed 7.5 - FALL MIXED

7 players · average NTRP 3.64 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs The Volley LlamasLost 02
L#1 DoublesBreanna Aldrich / Brock Taylor vs Lynda Fennern / Mark Kam1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElise Shurtliff / Michael Shurtliff vs Travis Baker / Jennifer Lloyd0-6, 0-6
2026-08-24vs Pretty midSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Hilton / Bowen Oswald vs Melanie Daw / Easton Daw2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrock Taylor / Breanna Aldrich vs Michelle Marlowe / Max Marlowe6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-19vs ThompsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBowen Oswald / Kathryn Hilton vs Ranay Thompson / Derick Thompson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElise Shurtliff / Michael Shurtliff vs Hailey Winegar / Tyson Parker1-6, 3-6
2026-08-17vs The Volley LlamasLost 02
L#1 DoublesBreanna Aldrich / Bowen Oswald vs Amie Belnap / Joe Belnap1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElise Shurtliff / Michael Shurtliff vs Lynda Fennern / Mark Kam1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Mixed 7.5 - FALL MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Volley Llamas000000
2Down the Line*000000
3Pretty mid000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jennifer Crofts
published 4
Brock Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Bowen Oswald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Elise Shurtliff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.30
Kathryn Hilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.68
Michael Shurtliff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Breanna Aldrich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elise Shurtliff + Michael Shurtliff01729% games−21.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Crofts
71W–60L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Brock Taylor
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Bowen Oswald
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Elise Shurtliff
116W–95L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Kathryn Hilton
4W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3
Michael Shurtliff
20W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Breanna Aldrich
20W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.