Teams

Lahaina Lobsters

2021 Adult 18 and Over League · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-17vs Maui MagicLost 23
W#1 DoublesTania Kellermeyer / Barbara Skaggs vs Linda Coleon / Susan Sato6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKim Houlne vs Sue Linder1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVal McKelvey / Theresa Delosada vs Darleen Ornellas / Gail Matsui3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Esther Juan5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesManjeet Surdhar / Luly Baker vs Diane Nagasaka / Jane Sakakihara6-2, 6-2
2021-07-11vs Aloha AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Skaggs / Tania Kellermeyer vs Kelly Thayer / Gaela Prince5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Stacey Behrendt0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLuly Baker / Kim Houlne vs Lore Lee Robello / Jennifer Granum2-6, 3-6
2021-06-27vs Maui MagicLost 05
L#1 DoublesVal McKelvey / Tania Kellermeyer vs Susan Sato / Janie King4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesStacie Thorlakson vs Bichha Kato6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Skaggs / Manjeet Surdhar vs Gail Matsui / Darleen Ornellas4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Rowena Nikki Baysa1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLuly Baker / Theresa Delosada vs Diane Nagasaka / Jaimie Brown1-6, 0-6
2021-06-13vs Aloha AcesLost 23
L#1 DoublesCarole Anderson / Valerie Giacomini vs Barbara Botkin / Catherine Hall6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSuLan Peebles vs Jennifer Granum1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTania Kellermeyer / Amanda Munoz vs Gaela Prince / Nancy Rueda-Vargas6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesStacie Thorlakson vs Stacey Behrendt6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLuly Baker / Theresa Delosada vs Mina Chaikin / Renee Jorg4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-05-30vs Maui MagicLost 14
W#1 DoublesCarole Anderson / Stacie Thorlakson vs Janie King / Jaimie Brown6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSuLan Peebles vs Emily Collins1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVal McKelvey / Tania Kellermeyer vs Gail Matsui / Darleen Ornellas6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Sue Linder1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Cross / Manjeet Surdhar vs Rowena Nikki Baysa / Linda Coleon3-6, 5-7
2021-05-23vs Aloha AcesLost 14
L#1 DoublesLuly Baker / Tania Kellermeyer vs Tamara Farwig / Gage Beerer0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarole Anderson vs Jennifer Granum0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStacie Thorlakson / Nancy Cross vs Gaela Prince / Stacey Behrendt6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Mina Chaikin2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Delosada / Val McKelvey vs Nancy Rueda-Vargas / Kelly Thayer2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
SuLan Peebles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.17
Tania Kellermeyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Celeste Abate
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Barbara Skaggs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Kim Houlne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Carole Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Luly Baker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Nancy Cross
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stacie Thorlakson
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Val McKelvey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie Giacomini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Giacomini + Stacie Thorlakson3256% games+2.7% vs expected
Nancy Cross + Barbara Skaggs17853% games+0.9% vs expected
Barbara Skaggs + Tania Kellermeyer3350% games−5.1% vs expected
Nancy Cross + Valerie Giacomini134 matchesnot enough data
Tania Kellermeyer + Celeste Abate224 matchesnot enough data
Tania Kellermeyer + Valerie Giacomini134 matchesnot enough data
Celeste Abate + Valerie Giacomini224 matchesnot enough data
Carole Anderson + Stacie Thorlakson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SuLan Peebles
321W–251L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
Tania Kellermeyer
42W–63L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Celeste Abate
22W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Barbara Skaggs
48W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kim Houlne
34W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
Carole Anderson
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Luly Baker
6W–10L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Cross
29W–32L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacie Thorlakson
40W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Val McKelvey
25W–35L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Valerie Giacomini
21W–19L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.