Teams

Gainer

2026 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.5 Women 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-01vs Capobianco CFCCWon 10
W#2 SinglesAndrea Talley vs Hayden Kirby6-2, 7-5
2026-02-28vs Dameron 18+Won 20
W#1 SinglesPaola Marie Colon Barbosa vs Johnna Munn3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCyndi Yoder vs Patricia Furbay6-3, 7-5
2026-02-23vs Seidel/NerellLost 02
L#2 SinglesCyndi Yoder vs Brie Pettid1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMariann Vonatski vs Kelly Nerell2-6, 3-6
2026-02-13vs Seidel/NerellLost 02
L#1 SinglesMariann Vonatski vs Corinne Monahan3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMaggie Blair vs Hannah Flynt4-6, 2-6
2026-01-30vs Dameron 18+Won 21
W#1 SinglesFrances Kelly vs Patricia Furbay6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCyndi Yoder vs Holly Dameron6-2, 7-5
L#3 SinglesMaggie Blair vs Johnna Munn4-6, 2-6
2026-01-17vs Capobianco CFCCWon 10
W#2 SinglesPaola Marie Colon Barbosa vs Kelly Capobianco6-4, 6-1
2026-01-12vs HanlyWon 20
W#2 SinglesAndrea Talley vs Molly Hanly6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesFrances Kelly vs Heather Weddle5-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Paola Marie Colon Barbosa
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.29
Frances Kelly
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
3.28
Catherine Strickland
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
3.22
Andrea Talley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Elizabeth Spale
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Cyndi Yoder
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Maggie Blair
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Mariann Vonatski
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.86
Helen Gainer
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Spale + Andrea Talley2352% games+5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paola Marie Colon Barbosa
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.82
3
Frances Kelly
29W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.29
3
Catherine Strickland
36W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.28
3.5
Andrea Talley
9W–17L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Elizabeth Spale
20W–14L career · type D · 7 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cyndi Yoder
14W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
Maggie Blair
28W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
Mariann Vonatski
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Helen Gainer
63W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.