Teams

EPease (Piper Glen)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-03vs ATrexler/KNelson (Jeff Adams)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Garner / Angela Donathan vs Caroline Stamatovich / Kate Kirschner4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Bissett / Shelley Crocker vs Ashley Fitzpatrick / Kate Terrigno6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlicia Fink / Katie Natterman vs Lauren Pelletier / Christina Volpe4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-26vs JWoodruff (CSRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKaty Walters / Hayley Franc vs Tracey Rosenberg / Christine Strife6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Pease / Hilary Lee vs Meg Flanagan / Tyler Newman7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKim Sheehey / Sarah Garner vs Heather Skelton / Charlotte Haydon6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-09-19vs TRogovin (JCC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAlicia Fink / Hilary Lee vs Amy Altieri / Meryl Hunte6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Cheek / Katie Bissett vs Carrie Feit / Caryn Craige6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAngela Donathan / Kandy Steiner vs Maria Palios / Maria Tsadaka3-6, 3-6
2025-09-05vs CAckels (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Bissett / Angela Donathan vs Carla Ackels / Ashley Sofsian4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-29vs CMcKiernan (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Pease / Hilary Lee vs Kelley Baughman / Jennifer Stacks6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Sheehey / Katie Bissett vs Katie Eggers / Ciara McKiernan7-5, 6-1
2025-08-22vs KBaldwin (Charlotte CC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Cheek / Hayley Franc vs Susan Peters / Jordan Collier3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Fink / Sarah Garner vs Mary Maund / Tracey Cook2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Pease / Hilary Lee vs Emily Tindel / Elizabeth Frederick6-2, 6-1
2025-08-20vs VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKim Sheehey / Sarah Garner vs Kathy King / Lori Cochrane6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShelley Crocker / Katie Bissett vs Susan Additon / Leslie Gaylord6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHayley Franc / Katy Walters vs Vanessa Pomfrey / Suzanne Jones6-0, 6-0
2025-08-15vs JHerlong/Ocallaghan (FCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKaty Walters / Hayley Franc vs Jennifer Herlong / Julianne Gray6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHilary Lee / Alicia Fink vs Meghan Rawlings / Johanne Bulger6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmanda Cheek / Katie Bissett vs TARA RAND / Dorie de Armas6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kim Sheehey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Amanda Cheek
published 3.5
3.28
Emily Pease
published
Angela Donathan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
TAMMIE BRANDT
published 3.5
3.11
Shelley Crocker
published
3.10
Hayley Franc
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Hilary Lee
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Sarah Garner
published
2.99
Alicia Fink
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Katie Bissett
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.87
Beth Dunn
published 3
2.54
Katie Natterman
published
Katy Walters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayley Franc + Hilary Lee4643% games−1.8% vs expected
Hilary Lee + Kim Sheehey2641% gamesnot enough data
TAMMIE BRANDT + Kim Sheehey3255% gamesnot enough data
Katie Bissett + Kim Sheehey2355% gamesnot enough data
Angela Donathan + Katie Bissett314 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Fink + Hilary Lee314 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Crocker + Kim Sheehey224 matchesnot enough data
Angela Donathan + Alicia Fink123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim Sheehey
54W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Amanda Cheek
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Emily Pease
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Angela Donathan
85W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
TAMMIE BRANDT
50W–32L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Shelley Crocker
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
3.5
Hayley Franc
80W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Hilary Lee
105W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Sarah Garner
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Alicia Fink
100W–91L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Katie Bissett
67W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Beth Dunn
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Katie Natterman
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Katy Walters
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.