Teams

Edwards-Alive After 55-Walden Lake Houston

*2025 Adult 55 & Over 6.0-9.0 NoHo Women · 7.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-13vs Bonds 007 Girls - Woodlands ParksWon 21
W#1 DoublesDorothy Gerloff / Michele Cochrane vs Elizabeth Hensley / Jeanne Rossi6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaria Figueroa / Linda Skarbovig vs Jeanne Houston / Tracy Boulanger5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Harper / Sharon Sessions vs Deann Jahns / Vereleta Saraceno6-1, 7-6
2025-03-06vs Johnson-Woodlands Country ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaphne Curry / Lisa Parrish vs Kristen Crane / Sally Johnson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanine Batterton / Amy Davis vs Lisa Anderson / Charlene Hansen7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMaria Moran / Shawn Hoffpauir vs Mary Crisp / Meg Garrison6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Harper / Christel Vanhoof vs Carol Viecelli / Caroline Miller0-6, 2-6
2025-02-27vs Conatser-April Sound CCLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Davis / Shawn Hoffpauir vs Trudi Buchan / Michelle Robertson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEileen Cocetti / Sharon Sessions vs Melissa Price / Margaret Woodyard5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanine Batterton / Maria Figueroa vs Julie Cameron / Kristie Goodrich3-6, 3-6
2025-02-26vs Palamar-Volley Girls-BentwaterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDorothy Gerloff / Maria Moran vs Brenda Palamar / Bridget Seals3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Cochrane / Amy Davis vs Walty Sample / Sue Congleton3-6, 1-6
2025-02-06vs Smith-Serve-ivors-KCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Parrish / Maria Figueroa vs Teri Cooper / Patty Matson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Sessions / Linda Harper vs Donna Wenner / Jane Wenner6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDaphne Curry / Eileen Cocetti vs Susan Descioli / Pamela Reinhardt0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesLinda Skarbovig / Shawn Hoffpauir vs Carol Buonfiglio / Liz Heasley3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Parrish / Maria Figueroa vs Lori VanJoslin / Dyana Spearman4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDeborah Edwards / Daphne Curry vs Regina Khim / Julie Wallison0-6, 0-6
2025-01-17vs Orth-KCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharon Sessions / Christel Vanhoof vs Jennifer Arthur / Natalie Kaple5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJanine Batterton / Linda Harper vs Mary Vosloh / Nancy Rivier-Rogers1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEileen Cocetti / Shawn Hoffpauir vs Amy Bennett / Kerry Orth7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Becky Raney
published 3.5
3.13
Christel Vanhoof
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Janine Batterton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Lisa Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Maria Figueroa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Daphne Curry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dorothy Gerloff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Eileen Cocetti
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Harper
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Skarbovig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Maria Moran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michele Cochrane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sharon Sessions
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Shawn Hoffpauir
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Vicki Kreger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Parrish + Maria Figueroa1538% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Parrish + Christel Vanhoof134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky Raney
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christel Vanhoof
8W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Janine Batterton
13W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Lisa Parrish
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Maria Figueroa
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Daphne Curry
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Dorothy Gerloff
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eileen Cocetti
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Harper
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Skarbovig
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Moran
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Cochrane
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Sessions
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Hoffpauir
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Kreger
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.