Teams

NE/Thomas/18&Over4.0M

2024 Neb. Adult 18&Over · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-10vs LeahyWon 32
W#1 DoublesAndrew Nelson / Myron Sikora vs Mark Leahy / Roland Augspurger6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCameron Crump vs Ryan Fehr6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDominik Crump / Jesus Perez vs Stephen Collins / Christian Cortinas4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesBrigham van Auken vs Paul Ronhovde4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Thomas / Robert Cimino vs Nicolas Eker / Greg Hepfner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-27vs WillmsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSteve Baker / Jeremias Graterol vs Dustin Laurent / Ross Jensen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Cimino / James Merrill vs Adeeb Adam / Douglas Stuva4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrigham van Auken vs Jack Dombrowski7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDominik Crump / Scott Adams vs Trevor Davis / Joe Engel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-20vs LeahyLost 13
L#1 DoublesScott Adams / James Merrill vs Alec Lubben / Nicolas Eker4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJoseph Shea vs Greg Hepfner7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJeremias Graterol / Myron Sikora vs Jeff Fredricks / Kelby Deese3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBrigham van Auken vs Naren Nathan7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-06vs WillmsLost 13
W#1 DoublesJeremias Graterol / Jesus Perez vs Dan Hrivnak / Josh Eveloff7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJames Merrill vs Aaron Jank3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarc Shaw / Scott Adams vs Joe Engel / Trevor Davis1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTed Sherman / Stephen Thomas vs James Knowlton / Joe Willms6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2024-05-16vs WillmsWon 32
W#1 DoublesJesus Perez / Jeremias Graterol vs Ross Jensen / Joe Engel6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCameron Crump vs Trevor Davis6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTed Sherman / Marc Shaw vs Roger Flohrs / James Knowlton3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrigham van Auken vs Douglas Stuva6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJames Merrill / Joseph Shea vs Marc DuBois / Brian Richmeier6-2, 6-4
2024-05-09vs LeahyWon 31
W#1 DoublesSteve Baker / Jeremias Graterol vs Roland Augspurger / Mark Leahy7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCameron Crump vs Alec Lubben7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarc Shaw / Joseph Shea vs Jeff Fredricks / Kelby Deese3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesScott Adams / James Merrill vs Daniel Reid / Paul Ronhovde6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEWC/McFarley/Tegler/18&Over4.0M71281227275
2Escamilla/Sullivan62221841353
3NE/Thomas/18&Over4.0M42151534298
4Willms24141639295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Cameron Crump
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Jeremias Graterol
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.92
Dominik Crump
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.89
James Merrill
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Stephen Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Brigham van Auken
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Marc Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Myron Sikora
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Jesus Perez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Shahab Abdessalam
published
Joseph Shea
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Steve Baker
published
Ted Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Thomas + Ted Sherman321455% games+0.5% vs expected
Jesus Perez + Jeremias Graterol7358% games−0.5% vs expected
Stephen Thomas + Steve Baker13363% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Shea + Myron Sikora2350% gamesnot enough data
Jeremias Graterol + Myron Sikora224 matchesnot enough data
Myron Sikora + Ted Sherman314 matchesnot enough data
James Merrill + Joseph Shea213 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Shea + Marc Shaw213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cameron Crump
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.09
Jeremias Graterol
21W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Dominik Crump
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
James Merrill
36W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
Stephen Thomas
75W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Brigham van Auken
44W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Marc Shaw
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Myron Sikora
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Jesus Perez
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
Shahab Abdessalam
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
Joseph Shea
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Baker
25W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ted Sherman
49W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.