Teams

Lasseigne/LR/LRAC

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Meredith Reddmann
published
3.54
Janna Jennings
published
3.54
Mary Dassinger
published
3.44
Sarah Wengel
published
3.42
Amanda Piechocki
published 3.5
3.39
Kathryn McMillian
published
3.37
Synchai Walls
published
3.34
Honor Canon
published
3.25
Muay Dillard
published
3.24
Emily Andrews-Clark
published
3.22
Kelly Lasseigne
published
3.18
Leah Willett
published
3.05
Sherrie Sandor
published
3.01
Bana Alshami
published 3.5
Vanessa McDaniel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn McMillian + Amanda Piechocki224 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Wengel + Amanda Piechocki314 matchesnot enough data
Bana Alshami + Sherrie Sandor044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Reddmann
22W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Janna Jennings
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Mary Dassinger
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Sarah Wengel
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Amanda Piechocki
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Kathryn McMillian
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Synchai Walls
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Honor Canon
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Muay Dillard
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Emily Andrews-Clark
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.24
Kelly Lasseigne
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Leah Willett
10W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
Sherrie Sandor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Bana Alshami
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Vanessa McDaniel
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.