Teams

Ballapalooza

2026 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-26vs Serves You RightLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Wirth / Judy DeBoer vs John Tesnohlidek / Stephanie Ferney6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJacob Logue / Brenda Krempaszky vs Kyle Lee / Yutong Luo6-4, 0-3
L#3 DoublesChris Ward / Michele Bowden vs Karen Rice / DAVID RENCHER5-5
2026-08-24vs Balls and RacqsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudy DeBoer / Matthew Wirth vs Chris Angermayer / Diana Linderman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Boyd / Chris Ward vs Matthew Rubio / Jackie Whitesell1-4
2026-08-19vs Slice and DiceLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Holmes / Chris Ward vs Gwen Blakeslee / Thomas Wiley4-6, 5-7
2026-08-17vs Serves You RightLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrenda Krempaszky / Eric Taylor vs Mark Howard / Yutong Luo4-6, 3-6
2026-08-12vs Balls and RacqsLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Ward / Brenda Krempaszky vs Brad Smith / Elizabeth Schneider1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Matthew Wirth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Chris La Fata
published 3
2.37
Kevin Hartsig
published 2.5
2.04
Chris Ward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.00
Michele Bowden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.92
Brenda Krempaszky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jacob Logue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Judy DeBoer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy DeBoer + Kevin Hartsig21430% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Holmes + Kevin Hartsig2823% gamesnot enough data
Judy DeBoer + Matthew Wirth5351% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Holmes + Chris Ward0830% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Hartsig + Brenda Krempaszky0618% gamesnot enough data
Judy DeBoer + Chris Ward044 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Krempaszky + Jacob Logue033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Matthew Wirth
36W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Chris La Fata
3W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
2.5
Kevin Hartsig
37W–175L career · no lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Chris Ward
2W–31L career · type M · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Michele Bowden
51W–106L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Brenda Krempaszky
1W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Jacob Logue
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Judy DeBoer
27W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Holmes
12W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.