Teams

Bulnes, Salina

2023 KS 18 & Over Tri-Level 4.--5.0 · Men's 4.0-5.0 Tri Level

7 players · average NTRP 5.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-08vs KS/Jones/Tri-Level4.0-5.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesBlake Hunter / Rafael Bulnes vs Karlo Skvorc / Felipe Batistella6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJordan Singh / Nolan Schrader vs Steven Wegner / Brandon Hadwiger4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatt Berneking / Jeremy Nelson vs Ryan Wolfe / Dustin Herman6-3, 6-4
2023-10-08vs KS/Jones/Tri-Level4.0-5.0MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJordan Singh / Nolan Schrader vs Brandon Hadwiger / Steven Wegner5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJeremy Nelson / Matt Berneking vs Dylan Jones / Ryan Wolfe6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-08vs KS/Jones/Tri-Level4.0-5.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesJordan Singh / Nolan Schrader vs Steven Wegner / Brandon Hadwiger4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeremy Nelson / Matt Berneking vs Dylan Jones / Ryan Wolfe3-6, 4-6
2023-10-01vs KS/Jones/Tri-Level4.0-5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMario Hernandez / Terry Neal vs Dylan Jones / Kurush Tavadia2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRafael Bulnes / Mel Brown vs Bruno Suiama / Kaey-Den Tan2-6, 3-6
2023-10-01vs KS/Jones/Tri-Level4.0-5.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesMatt Berneking / Jeremy Nelson vs Matt Becker / Dennis Matzen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRafael Bulnes / Mel Brown vs Kaey-Den Tan / Bruno Suiama3-6, 5-7
2023-10-01vs KS/Jones/Tri-Level4.0-5.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerry Neal / Mario Hernandez vs Dylan Jones / Kurush Tavadia7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatt Berneking / Jeremy Nelson vs Matt Becker / Dennis Matzen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRafael Bulnes / Mel Brown vs Kaey-Den Tan / Bruno Suiama1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0-5.0 Tri Level have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Blake Hunter
published 5
3.80
Jeremy Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jordan Singh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mario Hernandez
published
Mel Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rafael Bulnes
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Terry Neal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mel Brown + Rafael Bulnes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Blake Hunter
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeremy Nelson
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Jordan Singh
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mario Hernandez
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mel Brown
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rafael Bulnes
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terry Neal
22W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.