Teams

OATES/RVILLE/BP

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0,3.5,4.0 · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-04vs Rider/Maumelle/BPWon 50
W#1 DoublesAutumn Hemphill / Anna Squire vs Christa Clark / Karen Shepherd6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesShiloah Kviatkovsky vs Angele Forrest6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Oates / Kim Worrell vs Tiffanie Taylor / Margaret Jackson6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAbby Barr vs Jennifer Dartez6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmber Talley / Caroline Howse vs Hope Rider / Leandra Crook6-1, 6-3
2025-05-01vs Glenn/TGarretson/Maumelle/BPWon 32
L#1 DoublesKim Worrell / Melissa Oates vs Brooke Smith / Natalie Gorman1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Howse vs Holly Sessions6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAutumn Hemphill / Anna Squire vs Katie Rutledge / Kisha Boston6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAbby Barr vs Katelyn Lazenby6-4, 5-1
L#3 DoublesTess Bradford / Emily Andrews-Clark vs Kara Oko / Madeline Donahue6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-28vs CDavis/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Altrui / Emily Andrews-Clark vs Sarah Rech / Amy Ross6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesShiloah Kviatkovsky vs Teal Helton6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTess Bradford vs Roz Taylor6-3, 6-1
2025-04-22vs Titus/Rock/LR/PVCCLost 23
W#1 DoublesJordan Ryals / Kyla Bryant vs Amanda Piechocki / Shelby Fisher6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAbby Barr vs Sarah Declerk2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Talley / Caroline Howse vs Natalie Rockefeller / Molly Telford6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDiana Pearson Martin vs Anna Morshedi2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Andrews-Clark / Sarah Wengel vs Rachel Wayne / Samantha Skyrme6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Caroline Howse
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Diana Pearson Martin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.45
Tess Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.44
Sarah Wengel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Abby Barr
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Shiloah Kviatkovsky
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Kim Worrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Amber Talley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Anna Squire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Emily Andrews-Clark
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Autumn Hemphill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Melissa Oates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Kyla Bryant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Susan Altrui
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jordan Ryals
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Talley + Caroline Howse14756% games+4.3% vs expected
Kim Worrell + Melissa Oates314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Howse
31W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Diana Pearson Martin
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
Tess Bradford
16W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Sarah Wengel
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Abby Barr
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Shiloah Kviatkovsky
34W–34L career · 9 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
Kim Worrell
32W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Amber Talley
22W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Anna Squire
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Andrews-Clark
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.24
3.5
Autumn Hemphill
20W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Melissa Oates
26W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kyla Bryant
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Susan Altrui
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Jordan Ryals
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.