Teams

NJ GREEN

2025 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 4.09 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-06vs MC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Johnstone / Pamela Johnstone vs Laura MacKe / Douglas Wong6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Gomez / Yukiko Brooks vs ELIZABETH SKLAROFF / Patrick Martin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-29vs BP REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeng Lian / Natasha Uecker vs Kevin Matney / Hilaria Davis6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAlbert Eng / Kirstin Kraig vs Lawrence McGaughy / Heidi Halus6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Huynh / Emese Nagy vs Eric Huelson / Roselle Morala6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-28vs MC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeng Lian / Natasha Uecker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Michael Gomez vs Karl Herz / Dori Webb1-6, 4-6
2025-06-24vs RHCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Johnstone / Pamela Johnstone vs Ryan Wither / Katie Wither6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGreg Leaver / Karen Greenwood vs Bill Gallagher / Briana Jackson6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Stiebeling / Matt Farling vs Stephanie Joens / Matthew Charles2-6, 4-6
2025-06-15vs NJ GOLDWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Huynh / Emese Nagy vs Andy MacQueen / Emily Jensik6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGreg Leaver / Karen Greenwood vs Matthew Field / Sandra Lucero Jacquez7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Gomez / Kirstin Kraig vs Brian Messer / Crystal Campbell Messer6-4, 6-0
2025-06-01vs MC ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesNatasha Uecker / Meng Lian vs Denise Belk / Jeremy Kossler5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Johnstone / Pamela Johnstone vs Jaime Stokes / Patrick Martin0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmese Nagy / Michael Huynh vs Jody Dart / Douglas Wong6-3, 6-2
2025-05-25vs BP REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Greenwood / Greg Leaver vs Kevin Matney / Hilaria Davis5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Farling / Kirstin Kraig vs Eric Huelson / Roselle Morala3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesChristopher Johnstone / Pamela Johnstone vs Leslie Lane / David Lane6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Meng Lian
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.21
Emese Nagy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Christopher Johnstone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Albert Eng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Yukiko Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Karen Greenwood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Michael Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Matt Farling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Kirstin Kraig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Greg Leaver
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Jennifer Stiebeling
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.46
Pamela Johnstone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Michael Huynh
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.34
Natasha Uecker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natasha Uecker + Michael Huynh9266% games+15.1% vs expected
Emese Nagy + Albert Eng16269% games+14.9% vs expected
Christopher Johnstone + Pamela Johnstone10067% games+10.1% vs expected
Meng Lian + Natasha Uecker10264% games+8.9% vs expected
Meng Lian + Emese Nagy8165% games+8.6% vs expected
Christopher Johnstone + Yukiko Brooks4161% games−1.4% vs expected
Yukiko Brooks + Albert Eng2355% games−2.8% vs expected
Yukiko Brooks + Michael Gomez5345% games−12.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Meng Lian
102W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Emese Nagy
206W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Christopher Johnstone
66W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Albert Eng
125W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
Karen Greenwood
73W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Michael Gomez
65W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Matt Farling
48W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Kirstin Kraig
110W–102L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Greg Leaver
79W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Jennifer Stiebeling
175W–107L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Pamela Johnstone
194W–65L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Michael Huynh
105W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Natasha Uecker
96W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.