Teams

16 MAC Abel

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-10vs 10 Woodlake Racquettes - PrestonLost 01
L#2 SinglesMichelle Jepson vs Amanda Phillips3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-11-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-16vs 2 ACAC LewisWon 10
W#3 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Charmaine Nerone6-0, 6-4
2025-10-14vs 12 SCC Serve-vivors - WeisigerLost 01
L#3 SinglesMichelle Jepson vs Emily McClenny6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Jepson vs Rebecca Schwartz6-4, 2-3
W#3 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Amber Manry6-4, 4-3
2025-10-04vs 4 Southampton Roper 3.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesEleanor Gardner vs Alice McCollum6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEunice Williams vs Lily VanElderen7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJamie Stokes vs Pamela Hutzler6-1, 6-3
2025-09-30vs 6 MRTC Northnuts - LeyWon 10
W#2 SinglesMichelle Jepson vs Xuemin Ginsberg6-3, 7-5
2025-09-25vs 14 Westwood HarperWon 10
W#3 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Allison Rosen6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Kimberly Livingston
published
3.42
Madison Clapsaddle
published
3.41
Eunice Williams
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Megan Abel
published
3.28
Michelle Jepson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.28
Deirdre Vaughan
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Eleanor Gardner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Jamie Stokes
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deirdre Vaughan + Michelle Jepson7652% games−3.9% vs expected
Deirdre Vaughan + Eunice Williams224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Livingston
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Madison Clapsaddle
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Eunice Williams
20W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Megan Abel
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Michelle Jepson
130W–103L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Deirdre Vaughan
162W–178L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Eleanor Gardner
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Jamie Stokes
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.