Teams

NRRC: Full Metal Rackets

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 3.0 Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-25vs SLI: Get a GripLost 12
W#1 DoublesAna Bencosme / Katie Ciravolo vs Theresa Burton Sprague / Nancy King6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Jeffry / Megan Watkins vs Haynee Johnson / Susan West3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMICHELLE CHIU / Molly DeCresce vs Jessica Kayll / Sandra Wang1-6, 5-7
2026-03-11vs Greenwich Racquet Club:BlueWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Palermo / Dana Schwarcz vs Inga Skuratovsky / Caroline Paradiso3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-13vs SLI: The Forever InsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Palermo / Katie Ciravolo vs Chandra Turner / Erendira Matzumura6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-30vs Sportime HI - ArmadaWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Shipley / Kathy Palermo vs Bridget Bennett / Finola Hurley0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-21vs TIA New Rochelle 3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesMolly DeCresce / Amanda Heller vs Lindsay Gourevitch / Jill Brown4-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Balaji / Chiyo Itoh vs Natalie Green / Samantha Lituchy5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Leone / Victoria Woods vs Genevieve Weinkle / Masami Fukumuro6-7, 6-4
2026-01-14vs YTC: Queens of the CourtLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Shipley / Megan Watkins vs Sarah Miller / Stephanie Balkin4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Palermo / Katie Ciravolo vs Mila Burns / Suzanne Page0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMICHELLE CHIU / Jilliann Elliott vs Simone Bindela / DIVYA KAISHAP1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Megan Jeffry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Dana Schwarcz
published 3
2.82
Katie Ciravolo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Kathy Palermo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Amanda Heller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Ana Bencosme
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Susan Shipley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Molly DeCresce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Chiyo Itoh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
MICHELLE CHIU
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Stephanie Leone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Megan Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Jilliann Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Anita Balaji
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Victoria Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Palermo + Katie Ciravolo5261% games+7.1% vs expected
Molly DeCresce + Amanda Heller9257% games+7.1% vs expected
Dana Schwarcz + Kathy Palermo14457% games+6.9% vs expected
Susan Shipley + Megan Watkins4448% games+6.0% vs expected
MICHELLE CHIU + Kathy Palermo3446% games+5.4% vs expected
MICHELLE CHIU + Ana Bencosme7555% games+5.4% vs expected
Molly DeCresce + Susan Shipley2740% games+4.9% vs expected
Amanda Heller + Susan Shipley6553% games+3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Jeffry
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Dana Schwarcz
19W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Katie Ciravolo
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Kathy Palermo
47W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Amanda Heller
28W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Ana Bencosme
21W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Susan Shipley
26W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Molly DeCresce
25W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Chiyo Itoh
2W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
38%61%<1%
2.54
MICHELLE CHIU
19W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Stephanie Leone
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Megan Watkins
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38
Jilliann Elliott
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
3
Anita Balaji
12W–13L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.34
Victoria Woods
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.