Teams

VALLEY CHURCH 18AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

21 players · average NTRP / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-24vs RINCONADA PK 18AM3.5CLost 01
L#3 DoublesEdison Huang / Wei Su vs Victor Uong / Vatsal Oza3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Wei Zhou
published
3.82
James Yin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Yufeng Jiang
published
3.74
Xiang Lu
published
3.64
Nan Sun
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
He Lu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Shihe Cao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Shi Dong
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Yongfa Fan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Wei-Cheng Kuo
published
3.32
Edison Huang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Renxin Xia
published
3.16
Johnny Sendejo
published
3.14
Kan Yu
published
3.12
Wei Su
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Yaofeng Qiu
published
Hsienyu Tseng
published
Long Bu
published
Ning Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yingzhu Wang
published
Zhe Huang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wei-Cheng Kuo + Shihe Cao033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wei Zhou
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
James Yin
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Yufeng Jiang
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Xiang Lu
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Nan Sun
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
He Lu
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.60
Shihe Cao
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Shi Dong
36W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Yongfa Fan
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Wei-Cheng Kuo
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Edison Huang
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Renxin Xia
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Johnny Sendejo
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Kan Yu
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Wei Su
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Yaofeng Qiu
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Hsienyu Tseng
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Long Bu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ning Li
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Yingzhu Wang
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zhe Huang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.