Teams

Miley 55+ Joyner

2026 TriLevel 55&over-NE · Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-11vs NEAL 55+ TRI LEVELLost 03
L#1 DoublesCherie Ivey / Maggie Hamilton vs Nancy Palmer / Edi Williams1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandy Morris / Kathy Beasley vs Barbara Eaton / Debbie Ray2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJenny Wright / Sherry Vance vs Beth Ray / Allana McElwain3-6, 3-6
2026-07-30vs NEAL 55+ TRI LEVELWon 21
W#1 DoublesCherie Ivey / Janice Reynolds vs Dalisa Neal / Lynn Gibson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGentry Parker / Maggie Hamilton vs Stephanie West / Barbara Eaton6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenny Wright / Sandy Morris vs Nena Lowe / Allana McElwain2-6, 1-6
2026-07-28vs NEAL 55+ TRI LEVELLost 12
L#1 DoublesCherie Ivey / Janice Reynolds vs Nancy Palmer / Jennifer Caldwell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Beasley / Cyndi Sullivan vs Dalisa Neal / Laura Wright5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGentry Parker / Jenny Wright vs Diana Stembridge / Allana McElwain3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-21vs NEAL 55+ TRI LEVELLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Ray / Cherie Ivey vs Jennifer Caldwell / Edi Williams2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Wright / Maggie Hamilton vs Lynn Gibson / Stephanie West3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusie Miley / Sherry Vance vs Diana Stembridge / Beth Ray1-6, 1-6
2026-06-29vs NEAL 55+ TRI LEVELLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Ray / Janice Reynolds vs Mary Beth Smallwood / Jennifer Caldwell3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Kelly / Maggie Hamilton vs Barbara Eaton / Debbie Ray6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTerri Amacker / Kathy Beasley vs Diana Stembridge / Nena Lowe2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Cherie Ivey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Judy Ray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Maggie Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Gentry Parker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Sandy Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Kathy Beasley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Terri Amacker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Sherry Vance
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Susie Miley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Reddout
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Amacker + Kathy Beasley2537% games−4.2% vs expected
Sherry Vance + Susie Miley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cherie Ivey
34W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Judy Ray
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Maggie Hamilton
52W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Gentry Parker
17W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Sandy Morris
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Kathy Beasley
11W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Terri Amacker
11W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Sherry Vance
9W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Susie Miley
29W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.40
Pamela Reddout
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.