Teams

RTC-Toppano

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 5.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.56 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-15vs TCSP-SpainLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Alanis / Susan van Meter vs Lisa Williamson / Kristen Sycamore1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesD Shibata / Karen Hayward vs Lisa Sowder / Suzanne Kalberer3-6, 3-6
2025-11-09vs TCSP-KonoLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammy Besel / Deborah Milter vs Linda Zuckerman / Alysson Bashey3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebra Alanis / Carrie Toppano vs Susan Bussell / Mary Casey7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Shibata / Lynne Pogue vs Letitia Selk / Jenny Davidson4-6, 5-7
2025-10-18vs FC-Lobs of Fun-MoraSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNancy Otterholt / Deborah Milter vs Christel McArthur / Mary Cropp6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan van Meter / Lynne Pogue vs Jayme Horn / Renee Pitra4-6, 4-4
2025-10-10vs TCSP-KonoLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Toppano / Debra Alanis vs Linda Zuckerman / Alysson Bashey4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Quitasol / Yuriko Rosnow vs Letitia Selk / Mary Casey6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Hayward / D Shibata vs Michiko Kono / Terri Lee6-1, 6-0
2025-09-14vs TCSP-SpainWon 21
L#1 DoublesTammy Besel / Debra Alanis vs Lisa Williamson / Annette de Soto6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Otterholt / Lynne Pogue vs Monica Spain / Lisa Sowder6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Hayward / D Shibata vs Diana Einmo / Deirdre Gately6-2, 7-5
2025-09-06vs FC-Lobs of Fun-MoraSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDebra Alanis / Susan van Meter vs Jayme Horn / Renee Pitra6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCindy Quitasol / Lynne Pogue vs Mary Jordan / Mary Cropp4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Debra Alanis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.47
Susan van Meter
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
Nancy Otterholt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Karen Hayward
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.31
Tammy Besel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Debbie Shibata
published 2.5
Deborah Milter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.20
Lynne Pogue
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.19
Carrie Toppano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.05
Yuriko Rosnow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.97
Cindy Quitasol
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Toppano + Tammy Besel5354% games+6.9% vs expected
Carrie Toppano + Karen Hayward3542% games−7.5% vs expected
Deborah Milter + Nancy Otterholt2340% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Besel + Karen Hayward224 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Toppano + Susan van Meter033 matchesnot enough data
Karen Hayward + Susan van Meter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debra Alanis
7W–23L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Susan van Meter
1W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
Nancy Otterholt
26W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Karen Hayward
15W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Tammy Besel
59W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Debbie Shibata
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Deborah Milter
20W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Lynne Pogue
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Carrie Toppano
61W–88L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Yuriko Rosnow
16W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Cindy Quitasol
7W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.