Teams

Rock Paper Bond

2025 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-03vs NWW-TruongLost 01
L#1 DoublesBond Minard / Rocky Lindell vs Carlos Cardenas / Connor Cole3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-Truong7070238
2NWW-Narita6161235
3Washed5252551
4NWW-Parrish5252652
5Undampened Vibes4343749
6Spin Cycle4343868
7Cleaning3434862
8LoveAtFirstServe2323747
9CapChat1313749
10w(T__T)w1414959
11Mann 4.516161270
12Rock Paper Bond0303636
13Team Pink Pony Club0404847
14Poznick - Hogben07071484

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bond Minard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Rocky Lindell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bond Minard
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rocky Lindell
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.