← Teams

VTC-McKinnie

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jon Ellsworth
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Sean McKinnie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.35
Greg Mikol
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Bob Towne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Patrick Clancy
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Stephen Crook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Ramon Tuason
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Brad Shafer
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-06-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSean McKinnie / Patrick Clancy vs Tyler Clark / Frank O'Mahony6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRamon Tuason / Bob Towne vs David Hoiland / Deepak Shenoy6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMatt Savage / Brad Shafer vs Mark Shih / John Yu6-2, 6-2
2024-06-16Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSean McKinnie / Ramon Tuason vs John Liao / PHAT Lee6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrad Shafer / Greg Mikol vs Edmundo Arroyo / James Lawrence6-2, 6-3
2024-06-15Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesTimothy Johnson / Patrick Clancy vs Christopher Kayser / Ed Schwartz6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJon Ellsworth vs Mark King6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSean McKinnie / Bob Towne vs Pete Jacobs / Vilath Oudomphong6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrad Shafer / David Lee vs Paul Laurent / Terence Gariety6-2, 6-2
2024-06-09Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBob Towne / Greg Mikol vs Michael Parkhurst / Joe Malboeuf6-1, 6-2
2024-06-02Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesTimothy Johnson / Patrick Clancy vs Mark King / Pete Jacobs2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJon Ellsworth vs Keith Gordon6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRamon Tuason / Stephen Crook vs Terence Gariety / Andrew Kohlmetz6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMatt Savage / Sean McKinnie vs Paul Laurent / Omar Martinez6-4, 6-4
2024-06-01Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSean McKinnie / Jon Ellsworth vs Jim DeWeese / Jeffrey Gates4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Clancy / Stephen Crook vs David Hoiland / Deepak Shenoy6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSteven Townsend / Brad Shafer vs Tyler Clark / Seth Yount6-0, 6-2
2024-04-27Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesRamon Tuason / Patrick Clancy vs MICHAEL DOHERTY / Chris Hasle7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephen Crook / Matt Savage vs Tim Leatherman / Fred Winter7-5, 6-2
2024-04-14Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesTimothy Johnson / Patrick Clancy vs Jeff Lipke / Jason Dortch6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSean McKinnie vs Todd Khozein6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRamon Tuason / Stephen Crook vs Andrew Roessler / Matt Thayer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatt Savage / Brad Shafer vs Neville Mehta / Richard Jennings6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jon Ellsworth
50W–14L career
1%98%0%
3.75
3.5
Sean McKinnie
54W–52L career
0%95%5%
3.41
3.5
Greg Mikol
42W–26L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Bob Towne
17W–28L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Patrick Clancy
25W–36L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Stephen Crook
55W–66L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Ramon Tuason
59W–74L career
9%91%0%
3.12
3.5
Brad Shafer
18W–62L career
18%82%0%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.