Teams

BP - Brewster

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 40 & Over (Men) - Winter

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-11-25vs SQCC - JohnWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaurent Guitton / John Lepley vs Sam Sharpe / David Redick5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 40 & Over (Men) - Winter
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SG&YC - (Schivera)6024619197
2The Landings - Moesch42161435288
3BP - Brewster24171330235
4CRC - Copic/Gage15102041304

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Gustavo Cardone
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Royston Tedder
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
3.84
John Lepley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Laurent Guitton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.81
Thomas Oxnard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Raymond Merletti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Danny Boaen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Heath Graham
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.67
Daniel Reames
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Wes Tedder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Bobby Braswell
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Darin Brewster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Royston Tedder + Wes Tedder5354% games+8.9% vs expected
Bobby Braswell + Raymond Merletti303 matchesnot enough data
Gustavo Cardone + Heath Graham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gustavo Cardone
8W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
Royston Tedder
43W–28L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
John Lepley
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Laurent Guitton
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Thomas Oxnard
21W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Raymond Merletti
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Danny Boaen
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Heath Graham
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Daniel Reames
7W–13L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Wes Tedder
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Bobby Braswell
10W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Darin Brewster
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.