Teams

FV:DeBaeck

2022-23 NCT Tri Level men · 3.5 Tri Level Men 1

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-14vs FV:Farmington River Rats:A SimonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawid Stasiowski / Frederic de Baeck vs Rob Keppel / Alan Nathan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-12-12vs BSF:Colson/PolhamusLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrederic de Baeck / Dawid Stasiowski vs Carey Colson / Daniel Polhamus1-6, 3-6
2022-12-06vs BSF:Colson/PolhamusLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrederic de Baeck / Dawid Stasiowski vs Stuart Burwood / Carey Colson0-6, 1-6
2022-11-15vs BSF:Colson/PolhamusWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrederic de Baeck / Dawid Stasiowski vs Daniel Polhamus / Stuart Burwood7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-11-08vs FV:Farmington River Rats:A SimonLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrederic de Baeck / Jim Tillow vs Alan Nathan / Rob Keppel3-6, 4-6
2022-10-03vs FV:Farmington River Rats:A SimonLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrederic de Baeck / Jim Tillow vs Melvin Simon / Rob Keppel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Tri Level Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BSF:Colson/Polhamus5151338
2FV:Farmington River Rats:A Simon3333860
3FV:DeBaeck15151168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Dawid Stasiowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Frederic de Baeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jim Tillow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frederic de Baeck + Dawid Stasiowski3842% games−10.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawid Stasiowski
69W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Frederic de Baeck
72W–107L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Jim Tillow
93W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.