Teams

EFSC - Taylor

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.92 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-01vs RCCB - AboudWon 10
W#2 DoublesTrisha Watson / Karen Lee vs Erin Schlitts / Rachel Gould6-2, 6-3
2026-05-18vs Suntree - MikaWon 10
W#1 DoublesTrisha Watson / Karen Lee vs Jill Lyons / Jennifer Murtha6-2, 6-3
2026-05-11vs Suntree - FordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTrisha Watson / Dorota Dembinska vs Laura Breisch / Lindsay Schram6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Osborn / Karen Lee vs Sharon Ford / Valquiria Zalewski4-6, 3-6
2026-05-04vs Kiwanis - StoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Roesch / Trisha Watson vs Emma Linde / BROOKE STONE6-4, 6-0
2026-04-27vs EFSC - LeiterLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrisha Watson / Eileen Stapleton vs Linda Carrillo / Petra Elliott1-6, 3-6
2026-04-20vs Fee - RouveyrolWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Roesch / Karen Lee vs Kim Tice / Milena Alicea6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-15vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Lee / Trisha Watson vs Suzanne McBride / Kimberly Dooley7-5, 6-2
2026-04-13vs Brevard/HingleLost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Carol Roesch vs Dawn Green / Lindsay Nichols3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTrisha Watson vs Kerry Sawyer2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Shaffer / Teresa Osborn vs Morgan Bentley / Tricia Patterson0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Taylor / Eileen Stapleton vs Joanne Ludwig / Katherine Hingle6-4, 6-3
2026-04-03vs Rockledge - MullowneySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDorota Dembinska / Karen Lee vs Jenny Mullowney / Karen Kelly6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTrisha Watson vs Cindy Cozad7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Trisha Watson
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
Karen Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Carol Roesch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Cyndi Mcdougall
published 3
2.59
Eileen Stapleton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Dorota Dembinska
published 3
2.38
Lisa Shaffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Chris Bird
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Lee + Trisha Watson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Trisha Watson
130W–177L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
Karen Lee
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Carol Roesch
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cyndi Mcdougall
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Eileen Stapleton
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Dorota Dembinska
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Lisa Shaffer
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.38
2.5
Chris Bird
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.