Teams

Hilliard 18s 7.5M Combo Tues. PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 18 & Over Men Tues PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-25vs Whiteley/OFRC 18s 7.5M Combo Tues PmSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCurry Wilkinson / Huy Ho vs Gonzalo Quindos / Michael McGovern4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTony Lancaster / Ken Questell vs Richard Emmendorfer / Andrew Elsdon5-7, 1-6
2026-08-18vs Lara 18s 7.5M Combo Tues PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian McLeod / Cal Kimrey vs Scott Buchanan / Rohit Rajwade2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTony McGraw / Curry Wilkinson vs Charles Chuang / Rodrigo Lara1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHuy Ho / Chris Hanger vs Preston Thomas / Cameron Chong1-6, 4-6
2026-08-11vs Cochran 18s 7.5M Combo Tues PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Raley / Mark Williams vs Matthew Cochran / Samraat Saxena6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Kim / Seungil Park vs Stephen Davis / Anthony Jackson6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTony Lancaster / Ken Questell vs Jordan Cohen / Doug Jones7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 18 & Over Men Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Ken Questell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Brian McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Tony McGraw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Huy Ho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Michael Raley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Ryan Hilliard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Curry Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
J Stacey Allred
published
3.42
Chris Hanger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Anthony Bangay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Seungil Park
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Tony Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Cal Kimrey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Bangay + Ryan Hilliard7357% games+4.9% vs expected
Tony Lancaster + Ken Questell7749% games+1.8% vs expected
Chris Hanger + Huy Ho314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Questell
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Brian McLeod
15W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Tony McGraw
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Huy Ho
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Michael Raley
28W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%56%43%
3.48
Ryan Hilliard
39W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Curry Wilkinson
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
J Stacey Allred
12W–34L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.43
3.5
Chris Hanger
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Anthony Bangay
37W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Seungil Park
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Tony Lancaster
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Cal Kimrey
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.