Teams

Bennett/Backus/LR

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-27vs Ritch/HSVWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Dugan / Paul Kroger vs Edward Barbot / David Robinson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDana Bennett / Floyd Lang vs Chuck Brown / John Bakalekos6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTim Gunter / Pete Owens vs Mickey Robertson / Gary Cotter3-6, 1-6
2025-09-27vs Crum/SpringdaleWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Dugan / Paul Kroger vs Val Robison / Mike Horsman6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDana Bennett / Floyd Lang vs Stephen Adams / Jon Adams6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Gunter / Pete Owens vs Ricky Sutherlan / Herbert Crum6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-26vs Wallman/Bella VistaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDana Bennett / Kim Backus vs John Zapp / Michael Schleeper7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPete Owens / Paul Kroger vs David Zago / Jim Denno6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFloyd Lang / John Cloud vs Steven Hebert / Steve Bothwell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Pete Owens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Kim Backus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dana Bennett
published 3
2.74
John Cloud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Kevin Dugan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Floyd Lang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Tim Gunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Kroger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Kroger + Pete Owens303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pete Owens
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Kim Backus
16W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Dana Bennett
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Cloud
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Kevin Dugan
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Floyd Lang
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Tim Gunter
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Paul Kroger
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.