← Teams

VTC-Lembke

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Denise Dawkins
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Kim Hamlik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Patricia Sturr
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.71
Amy Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2018-11-17Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesAmy Hicks / Kim Wheeler vs Shelley Kolb / Traina Giles6-1, 7-5
2018-11-04Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKim Hamlik / Jacqueline Wilcox vs Carolyn Bachhuber / Caroline Hall6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Hicks / Lena Forrester vs Lisa Schaller / Della Shanley6-4, 7-5
2018-10-21Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Trylla Lembke vs Vera Vos / Kristi Tompkins6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLena Forrester / Amy Hicks vs Lori Zoborowski / Robbi Matarrese6-3, 6-2
2018-10-13Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Trish Carder vs Barbara Pasmore / Tamara Phillips7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2018-10-07Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Kim Wheeler vs Vera Vos / Dee Dee Elsey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Trish Carder vs Joanna Conan / Alison Toal6-3, 6-2
2018-09-30Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Trylla Lembke vs Alison Davis / Janae Pyle6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Hamlik / Amy Hicks vs Julia Hall / Pam Saftler6-1, 6-1
2018-09-22Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Amy Hicks vs Shirley Layton / Gretta Powell6-2, 6-2
2018-09-16Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKim Hamlik / Lena Forrester vs Cary Strauch / Kathleen Francis6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Denise Dawkins
59W–54L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kim Hamlik
24W–44L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Patricia Sturr
59W–77L career
not enough data
—
3
Amy Hicks
57W–67L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.