Teams

Trash Pandas

Tri Level · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-11-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesAdriana Daza / Cynthia Boase vs Kalynn Swinbank / Carol Block6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Cynthia Boase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Rebecca Haskin
published
3.37
Frankie Erickson
published 3.5
3.35
Penny Smith-Hill
published
3.23
Kimberly Dennison
published
Esmeralda Mendez
published
Lydia Mireles
published
Melissa Gonzalez
published
Terry Whitaker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lydia Mireles + Melissa Gonzalez6455% games+11.2% vs expected
Melissa Gonzalez + Cynthia Boase4843% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Boase
63W–57L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Rebecca Haskin
26W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Frankie Erickson
77W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Penny Smith-Hill
57W–42L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kimberly Dennison
28W–37L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Esmeralda Mendez
4W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lydia Mireles
25W–36L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Gonzalez
30W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Whitaker
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.