Teams

COLLIER/ Brown/Trilevel4.5/4.0/3.5Women

2023 Collier Trilevel Spring · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-17vs Hammock Bay - FuccilloWon 20
W#1 DoublesKari Gustafson / Gina Adiutori vs Stephanie Foley / Mira Rochford6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNicki Sebold / Dayna Webre vs Cheryl Solimine / Marianne Khayat6-0, 6-1
2023-05-10vs Hammock Bay - FuccilloWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Adiutori / Lynne Hancock vs Stephanie Foley / Kristy Cardina4-6
2023-04-26vs Hammock Bay - FuccilloWon 20
W#1 DoublesKari Gustafson / Gina Adiutori vs Stephanie Foley / Amanda Myers7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNicki Sebold / Kristie McCormick vs Marianne Khayat / Cheryl Solimine6-1, 6-4
2023-04-19vs Hammock Bay - FuccilloWon 20
W#1 DoublesMacKenzie Rickman / Gina Adiutori vs Stephanie Foley / Tonja Brewer6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDayna Webre / Kristie McCormick vs Andrea Washak / Cheryl Solimine6-0, 6-3
2023-04-05vs Hammock Bay - FuccilloWon 10
W#2 DoublesDayna Webre / Nicki Sebold vs Marianne Khayat / LISA AQUINO6-0, 6-3
2023-03-22vs Hammock Bay - FuccilloWon 10
W#2 DoublesDayna Webre / Nicki Sebold vs Cheryl Solimine / LISA AQUINO6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Nicki Sebold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
4.23
Gina Adiutori
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Mackenzie Rickman
published
4.04
Kristie McCormick
published
4.02
Dayna Webre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Amy Gardner
published 4
3.61
Nikki Miller
published
3.42
Cheryl Ingram
published 3.5
3.37
Lucy Slaboch
published
Kari Gustafson
published
Lynne Hancock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dayna Webre + Nicki Sebold27662% games+1.4% vs expected
Mary Miranda-Del Rossi + Nicki Sebold6752% games−5.9% vs expected
Dayna Webre + Gina Adiutori1541% gamesnot enough data
Mackenzie Rickman + Mary Miranda-Del Rossi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nicki Sebold
120W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
Mary Miranda-Del Rossi
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Gina Adiutori
197W–104L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Mackenzie Rickman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Kristie McCormick
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Dayna Webre
148W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Amy Gardner
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.95
Nikki Miller
30W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Cheryl Ingram
107W–67L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Lucy Slaboch
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Kari Gustafson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynne Hancock
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.