Teams

HRCA-N ORANGE

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-10vs KC-CC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonna Mulqueen / Elise Marks-Gruitch vs Laurie Lopez / Kerry Anders6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelinda Shaffer / Adele Rhinehart vs Beth Beers / Laura Grush7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAllison Langenderfer / Denise Debartolomeis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-03vs PH YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonna Mulqueen / Elise Marks-Gruitch vs Shawna Morgan / Brooke Fox6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Cabot / Melissa Miller vs Melodie Harris / Christina Quigley6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelinda Shaffer / Adele Rhinehart vs Lori Silliman / Michele Olree5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-27vs LEBTC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonna Mulqueen / Elise Marks-Gruitch vs Ashley Franklin / Amy Quinette6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephanie Fry / Maureen Breitenbach vs Diana Nice / Claudia Swanson7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelinda Shaffer / Adele Rhinehart vs Kathleen Samuelli / Carmel Hanson6-2, 6-0
2026-05-20vs GR NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Miller / Lisa Cabot vs Michelle Windemuller / Heather Killeen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaureen Breitenbach / Stephanie Fry vs Lisa Herring / Stacey Persichetti4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesFauna MacKillip / Allison Langenderfer vs Lynn Hoppe / Lisa Killion6-2, 6-2
2026-05-15vs LEBTC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Miller / Elise Marks-Gruitch vs Mary Devine / Janet Swanson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephanie Fry / Maureen Breitenbach vs Susan OBrien / Becki Jernigan6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKaty Adler / Denise Debartolomeis vs Dorothy Carr / Kellie Naclerio6-2, 6-1
2026-05-13vs BM PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaureen Breitenbach / Stephanie Fry vs Rebecca Grace / Nancy Crease6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaty Adler / Denise Debartolomeis vs Jennifer Richey / Barbara Pryor6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAllison Langenderfer / Fauna MacKillip vs Mary Hobson / Cheri Bradley6-1, 6-0
2026-04-29vs HRCA-N REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Cabot / Elise Marks-Gruitch vs Alice Soderman / Kelli Murphy6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFauna MacKillip / Katy Adler vs Jana Warwick / Linda Murray4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJonna Mulqueen / Adele Rhinehart vs Cary Peskin / Patti Hildebrand6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jonna Mulqueen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Elise Marks-Gruitch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Stephanie Fry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Katy Adler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Adele Rhinehart
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Melinda Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Maureen Breitenbach
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Fauna MacKillip
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Allison Langenderfer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Lisa Cabot
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Denise Debartolomeis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Debartolomeis + Allison Langenderfer91054% games+5.0% vs expected
Adele Rhinehart + Melinda Shaffer10653% games+1.9% vs expected
Fauna MacKillip + Allison Langenderfer272450% games+1.3% vs expected
Maureen Breitenbach + Katy Adler4450% games−6.8% vs expected
Denise Debartolomeis + Katy Adler4160% gamesnot enough data
Elise Marks-Gruitch + Jonna Mulqueen3250% gamesnot enough data
Fauna MacKillip + Katy Adler1448% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Breitenbach + Stephanie Fry314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jonna Mulqueen
106W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Elise Marks-Gruitch
98W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Stephanie Fry
33W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Katy Adler
65W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Adele Rhinehart
96W–104L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Melinda Shaffer
15W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Maureen Breitenbach
80W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Fauna MacKillip
158W–112L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Allison Langenderfer
80W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Lisa Cabot
47W–48L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Denise Debartolomeis
83W–107L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.