Teams

LATA18/Hunter/LCC

18 & Over Combo · 9.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-26vs LLAS UPTA18C/ Pandya/Holly TreeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNicholas Gaffos / Eric Hogue vs Michael Brown / Hunter Yarborough2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLane Hinson / Jordan Hunter vs Evan Greer / Scott Schmeissing6-3, 6-3
2025-10-26vs LCTA18/Smith/WDLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Wiggins / Joseph Roche Sr vs Stanley Waters / Parker Davis6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLane Hinson / Charles Webb vs Donald Bruner / Dakota Greathouse6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNicholas Gaffos / Eric Hogue vs Julian Tellez / Craig Leslie2-6, 2-6
2025-10-25vs LCTA18/Elliget/I’OnLost 12
L#1 DoublesSean Nguyen / Charles Webb vs Adam Elliget / Doug MacKelcan5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLane Hinson / Steven Junis vs Luke Kusmider / Walker Long4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNicholas Gaffos / Eric Hogue vs James T Elliget / John Bumgarner6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Lane Hinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.61
Sean Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Eric Hogue
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.39
Jordan Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.37
Charles Webb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Jamie Benefield
published
4.26
Andrew Wescott
published 4.5
4.17
Kyle Edwards
published
4.13
Joseph Roche Sr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nicholas Gaffos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Wil Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Hunter + Kyle Edwards314 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Roche Sr + Jamie Benefield303 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Gaffos + Eric Hogue123 matchesnot enough data
Sean Nguyen + Lane Hinson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lane Hinson
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.78
Sean Nguyen
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Eric Hogue
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
4.41
Jordan Hunter
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Charles Webb
47W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.37
Jamie Benefield
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Andrew Wescott
26W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
Kyle Edwards
22W–8L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
Joseph Roche Sr
24W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
Nicholas Gaffos
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wil Brown
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.