Teams

Adin4me

2022 Coppermine Tri-Level 18 & Over · Coppermine Tri-Level 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-20vs Team CrawleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargaret Grow-Sadler / Heather Chilcot vs Anne McKissick / Lee WILLIAMS4-6, 2-6
2022-10-24vs Team ScottLost 02
L#2 DoublesHeather Nesti / Kate Chenault vs Jean Acuna / Jennifer Exelby2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Margaret Grow-Sadler vs Aimee MacEda / Michelle Tyde2-6, 5-7
2022-08-24vs Team TetraultLost 01
L#2 DoublesKate Chenault / Ann Marsh vs Alicia Mabry / Cecilia-Hien Phan0-6, 4-6
2022-08-11vs Team ScottLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Marsh / Jennifer Rauhofer vs Elizabeth Scott / Beth van Derslice2-6, 4-6
2022-08-04vs Team CrawleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Chilcot / Ann Marsh vs Shannon Biggs / Tannan Hagyard6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Tri-Level 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Kimberly Ford
published
3.44
Brooke Davidson
published 3.5
3.31
Karin Davis
published
3.14
Heather Nesti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Ann Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Donna Slaughter
published 3.5
2.77
Dianna Sinofsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Margaret Grow-Sadler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.32
Brigit Bowers
published 2.5
2.10
April Wilmer
published 2.5
Thelma Leitzer-Kerr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Ford + Brooke Davidson314 matchesnot enough data
Heather Nesti + Dianna Sinofsky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Ford
55W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Brooke Davidson
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Karin Davis
22W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3
Heather Nesti
180W–165L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Ann Marsh
14W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.07
3.5
Donna Slaughter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Dianna Sinofsky
43W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Margaret Grow-Sadler
40W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Brigit Bowers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
April Wilmer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Thelma Leitzer-Kerr
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.