Teams

Sequoyah/Annette Poole

2023 Sequoyah Tri-Level 55 & Over - Spring · 55 & Over Ladies 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-06-25vs Sequoyah/Tina JonesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnnette Poole / Margie DeShon vs Bonnie Burden / Tina Jones7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Carole Pearson
published 4
3.47
Teresa Cain
published
3.37
Annette Poole
published 3.5
3.35
Telisa Chapman
published
3.29
Nancy Carr
published
3.25
Regina Hicks
published
3.25
Christina Woods
published 3.5
2.75
Martha Millican
published
2.63
Angela Evans
published 3
2.60
Lisa Wheat
published
Margie DeShon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rhonda Garrett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Carr + Regina Hicks4254% games−0.1% vs expected
Telisa Chapman + Regina Hicks134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carole Pearson
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
Teresa Cain
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Annette Poole
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.37
Telisa Chapman
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Nancy Carr
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Regina Hicks
37W–35L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Christina Woods
6W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Martha Millican
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Angela Evans
20W–40L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
2.63
Lisa Wheat
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Rhonda Garrett
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.