Teams

SLittleton

2022 Capital Fall 18 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-10-19vs KKelly SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs McGavock Edwards6-0, 6-0
2022-10-12vs JBoltonWon 20
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Michelle Mills6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLaurel Saunders vs Lori Krzeszewski6-4, 6-1
2022-10-05Won 20
W#2 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Lindsay Gorman6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesLaurel Saunders vs Sarah Hill Waters6-1, 6-1
2022-09-28vs BWilhelm SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Skylar Poole3-6, 1-6
2022-09-21Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Carleigh Moore3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Mallory Altneu2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesLaurel Saunders vs Amanda Davis6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-14vs KKelly SinglesWon 10
W#3 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs McGavock Edwards6-1, 6-1
2022-09-07Won 10
W#2 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Michelle Mills6-4, 6-2
2022-08-31Won 10
W#3 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Lindsay Gorman6-2, 6-1
2022-08-24vs BWilhelm SinglesSplit 11
L#2 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Leigh Barter4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesHolly Atkinson vs Silpa Yalamanchili6-4, 6-2
2022-08-17vs LArcosWon 20
W#2 SinglesKatelyn Applegate vs Liz Arcos6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesLaurel Saunders vs Leigh McClure7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Julie Dougherty
published
3.49
Shannon Littleton
published
3.19
Katelyn Applegate
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.11
Holly Atkinson
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Laurel Saunders
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Littleton + Julie Dougherty12957% games+3.2% vs expected
Katelyn Applegate + Laurel Saunders5544% gamesnot enough data
Holly Atkinson + Katelyn Applegate5357% gamesnot enough data
Holly Atkinson + Laurel Saunders123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Dougherty
49W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
Shannon Littleton
38W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Katelyn Applegate
87W–47L career · 8 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Holly Atkinson
253W–179L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Laurel Saunders
40W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.