Teams

Divin/Caton

2026 STL Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Combined

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 10 6:00 PM
vs St. Louis - Forest Park - Dwight Davis Tennis Center
Lori DivinJennifer Caton
Sep 17 6:00 PM
vs St. Louis - Forest Park - Dwight Davis Tennis Center
Darwin HaskinsDERRICK WILLIAMS
Sep 24 6:00 PM
vs St. Louis - Forest Park - Dwight Davis Tennis Center
Lori DivinJennifer Caton
2026-08-27vs Cash Me Out (Haskins)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Miller / Brett Miller vs Danita Cole / DERRICK WILLIAMS3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKerry Jones / Jeffrey Traigle vs Darwin Haskins / Sabrina Siyanbola6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudy Malpiedi / Kurt Feigley vs Judith Connor / Bob Jurczyk2-6, 1-6
2026-08-20vs Cash Me Out (Haskins)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Malpiedi / Jeffrey Traigle vs Danita Cole / DERRICK WILLIAMS4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLori Divin / Kurt Feigley vs Darwin Haskins / Sabrina Siyanbola5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Caton / Ed Votoupal vs Rochelle Moore / Ernest Coleman1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Divin/Caton000000
2Cash Me Out (Haskins)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Kerry Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Brett Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Judy Malpiedi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Lori Divin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Jeffrey Traigle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Jennifer Caton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Miller
published
Kurt Feigley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Miller + Brett Miller201055% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Jones
70W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Brett Miller
75W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Judy Malpiedi
126W–160L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Lori Divin
68W–104L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Jeffrey Traigle
63W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Jennifer Caton
29W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Julie Miller
47W–56L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kurt Feigley
6W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.