Teams

FC: Barnabe

2025 RI Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed Flight 1

16 players · average NTRP 2.83 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-22vs WB: Holmstedt/KerrWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Barnabe / Federico Read vs Mark Hengen / Tineke Chan6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Lefebvre / Amy Carroll-Fabregue vs Meg Kerr / Charles Henoch6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRoxanne Vrees / Matthew Vrees vs Eric Holmstedt / Lita Fennell6-1, 6-2
2025-02-08vs CC: Double the Fun/WangLost 12
W#1 DoublesKris Mayer / Federico Read vs Katie Wang / Paul Krause6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJon Mayer / Kimberly Lewis vs Bill Gaule / Jennifer Colwell2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Curtiss / Christopher Sene vs Francine McVay / Terence Charles1-6, 2-6
2025-01-11vs CC: Double the Fun/WangWon 21
L#1 DoublesMartin Max Cox / Kimberly Lewis vs Adam Williams / Lori-Ann Zarycki5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesFederico Read / Michelle Fahy vs Timothy Herbert / Karen Morrone6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Carroll-Fabregue / Michael Lefebvre vs Christopher Fowler / Jacqueline McKinney6-2, 7-5
2025-01-05vs WB: Holmstedt/KerrSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaty Berard / Greg Berard vs Eric Holmstedt / Maureen Dipietro6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRoxanne Vrees / Matthew Vrees vs Devorah Brumberger / Charles Henoch6-2, 6-7, 0-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Federico Read
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Michael Lefebvre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Kris Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Greg Berard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Carol Barnabe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.34
Ingrid Read
published 2.5
2.29
Amy Carroll-Fabregue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Christopher Sene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jessica Curtiss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katy Berard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Lewis
published
Martin Max Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Vrees
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Fahy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roxanne Vrees
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Federico Read + Ingrid Read102839% games−2.9% vs expected
Carol Barnabe + Martin Max Cox11040% games−15.5% vs expected
Carol Barnabe + Federico Read31039% games−16.0% vs expected
Jon Mayer + Kris Mayer71941% gamesnot enough data
Katy Berard + Greg Berard7558% gamesnot enough data
Michael Lefebvre + Amy Carroll-Fabregue4448% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Curtiss + Christopher Sene2539% gamesnot enough data
Carol Barnabe + Jon Mayer1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Federico Read
49W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
Michael Lefebvre
17W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Kris Mayer
53W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Greg Berard
7W–5L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Carol Barnabe
49W–100L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Ingrid Read
22W–54L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Amy Carroll-Fabregue
11W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Christopher Sene
2W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Curtiss
38W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jon Mayer
15W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katy Berard
23W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Lewis
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Martin Max Cox
16W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Vrees
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Fahy
10W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Roxanne Vrees
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.