Teams

Huskey -Faulkner

2025 NETX Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-11vs Miller - TASCWon 31
W#1 DoublesKimberly Henry / Teresa Jasinski vs Lisa Douglas / Amber Herrin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristi Huskey vs Jessica Helgesen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeedee Keener / Deborah Lowe vs Shelby Burkett / Kasey Boatright6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAngie McHann / Simone James vs Crystal Martin / Melissa Jackson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-25vs Davis/Loving - HollytreeSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gray / Teresa Jasinski vs Lesley Manuel / Dayna Mayer6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDiana Norwood vs Lori Bearden2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Lowe / Snizhana Zhdanova vs Deesa Loving / Lisa McCrary4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSimone James / Stacy Cromer vs Meridith Twaddell / Leah Leifer5-7, 5-7
2025-02-17vs Davis/Loving - HollytreeWon 31
W#1 DoublesTeresa Jasinski / Kristi Huskey vs Lesley Manuel / Dayna Mayer3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDiana Norwood vs Andria Stein2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDeedee Keener / Joyce Mallory vs Lianne Sanchez / Tina Saczek6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Henry / Ann Skogerboe vs Erna de Boer / Susan Davis6-3, 6-1
2025-02-04vs Miller - TASCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gray / Kristi Huskey vs Jamie Kirby / Amber Herrin6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTeresa Jasinski vs Jillian Abernathy2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Lowe / Deedee Keener vs Cathy Davis / Jessica Helgesen6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSimone James / Angie McHann vs Adrianne Miller / Melissa Jackson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Ann Skogerboe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Joyce Mallory
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Deedee Keener
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Deborah Lowe
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Kimberly Henry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Stacy Cromer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Diana Norwood
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Angie McHann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Kristi Huskey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.08
Simone James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Snizhana Zhdanova
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Teresa Jasinski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jennifer Gray
published
Sassy Crookshanks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Jasinski + Kristi Huskey101047% games+4.6% vs expected
Deedee Keener + Joyce Mallory17560% games+1.4% vs expected
Kimberly Henry + Ann Skogerboe4450% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Lowe + Deedee Keener5160% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Lowe + Teresa Jasinski123 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Cromer + Simone James123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Skogerboe
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Joyce Mallory
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Deedee Keener
24W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Deborah Lowe
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kimberly Henry
24W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Stacy Cromer
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Diana Norwood
10W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Angie McHann
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Kristi Huskey
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Simone James
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Snizhana Zhdanova
33W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Teresa Jasinski
20W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Jennifer Gray
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sassy Crookshanks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.