Teams

Forever Young

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over Day · Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-10vs KnouseWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonna Slaughter / Lama Shikani vs Susan Reichard / Nancy Trimble3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesLama Shikani / Donna Slaughter vs Sally Barkley / Karen Greenfield6-0, 6-4
2022-06-01vs KnouseLost 01
L#3 DoublesLama Shikani / Donna Slaughter vs Valerie Mockapetris / Susan Groman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesLama Shikani / Donna Slaughter vs Karen Greenfield / Catherine Barth7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Emily Frank
published 3.5
3.24
Diane Carson
published 3.5
3.08
Lama Shikani
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Donna Slaughter
published 3.5
2.90
Joy Kirk
published
Thelma Leitzer-Kerr
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Frank
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Diane Carson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Lama Shikani
88W–79L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Donna Slaughter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
Joy Kirk
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Thelma Leitzer-Kerr
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.