Teams

Coral Reef - Picard

2022 Miami-Dade Social South Florida Women's Double Tennis · B-1

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2022-05-03vs KBTA - ArizmendyLost 02
L#4 Female DoublesHolly Lopez / Beth DeCamp vs Anamaria Raaijen / Beatriz Jugo3-6, 6-7
L#6 Female DoublesPatricia Nathan / Annette Lopez vs Cindi Dziura / Maria Cynthia Zupan4-6, 0-6
2022-04-19vs Dante Fascell - ThayerWon 10
W#5 Female DoublesCarole Bernstein / Beth DeCamp vs Jessica Patino / Ana Romero Nunez3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-12vs Coral Oaks - FabryLost 12
L#2 Female DoublesBeth DeCamp / Rosemarie Sterling vs Tati Katz / Claudia van Essen1-6, 2-6
L#5 Female DoublesJan Novar / Patricia Nathan vs Sherrie Smyth / Stephanie Voell6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#6 Female DoublesCarole Bernstein / Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez vs Elaine Casey / Karen Razook6-2, 6-1
2022-03-08vs Miami Beach Tennis Center - PerezWon 21
W#4 Female DoublesCarole Bernstein / Beth DeCamp vs Hilda Coronel / Wilma Rascoe6-4, 6-3
L#5 Female DoublesMichelle Sarason / Patricia Nathan vs Patricia Gill / Marcia Montoya2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#6 Female DoublesAnnette Lopez / Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-22vs Deering Bay - PorterSplit 11
L#2 Female DoublesBeth DeCamp / Holly Lopez vs Juliana Neves / Maria Feldman2-6, 1-6
W#6 Female DoublesCarole Bernstein / Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez vs Elizabeth Strombom / Helen Sonenreich6-1, 6-1
2022-02-08vs Continental Park - TorresWon 20
W#4 Female DoublesBeth DeCamp / Rosemarie Sterling vs Connie Goodman-Milone / Djamilia Junco6-2, 6-0
W#6 Female DoublesPatricia Nathan / Gloria Suarez-Sanchez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-25Won 20
W#3 Female DoublesBeth DeCamp / Holly Lopez vs Laurie Stein / Maritza Marchand6-4, 6-2
W#6 Female DoublesCarole Bernstein / Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez vs Milly Burke / Adrienne Jacobson6-1, 6-1
2022-01-11vs KBTA - ArizmendySplit 11
L#3 Female DoublesBeth DeCamp / Holly Lopez vs Gisell Stella / Lisa Arizmendy6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#5 Female DoublesCarole Bernstein / Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez vs Maria Giardinelli / Valerie Seeve6-4, 6-1
2021-12-14vs Dante Fascell - ThayerWon 21
W#4 Female DoublesBeth DeCamp / Holly Lopez vs Martha Pujals / Ellen Grabelsky6-2, 6-4
L#5 Female DoublesJan Novar / Patricia Nathan vs Maria Obregon / Trisha Fuerst1-6, 1-6
W#6 Female DoublesCarole Bernstein / Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez vs Paula Connor / Ana Romero Nunez7-5, 6-1
2021-11-30Won 10
W#5 Female DoublesGloria Suarez-Sanchez / Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez vs Sherrie Smyth / Rachel Malueg6-2, 6-0
2021-11-16Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesBeth DeCamp / Rosemarie Sterling vs Michelle Wallach / Lisa Yero6-3, 6-4
2021-11-12vs Deering Bay - PorterLost 02
L#4 Female DoublesBeth DeCamp / Holly Lopez vs Cathy Pariser / Maria Feldman1-6, 5-7
L#6 Female DoublesGloria Suarez-Sanchez / Patricia Nathan vs Ivory Shevin / Amy Shapiro5-7, 0-6
2021-10-05Lost 01
L#5 Female DoublesMaribel Guenaga-Gonzalez / Camille ONeill Smith vs Monique Rosenthal / Henrietta Schwarz3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for B-1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Lorena Alonso
published
2.92
Beth DeCamp
usually #4 Female Doubles 46%, also #3 Female Doubles 27% · published 3
2.88
Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez
usually #6 Female Doubles 63%, also #5 Female Doubles 38% · published 3
2.83
Patricia Nathan
usually #6 Female Doubles 50%, also #5 Female Doubles 50% · published
2.77
2.76
Carole Bernstein
published 3
2.74
Holly Lopez
published 3
2.73
Annette Lopez
published 3
2.65
Rosemarie Sterling
published
2.64
Lisa James
published
2.60
Cheryl Levin
published 3
2.54
AnaElena Multach
published 3
2.39
Helen Picard
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Nathan + Helen Picard123 matchesnot enough data
Helen Picard + Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorena Alonso
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Beth DeCamp
125W–77L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Maribel Guenaga-Gonzalez
66W–50L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
2.88
Patricia Nathan
28W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Gloria Suarez-Sanchez
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Carole Bernstein
26W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Holly Lopez
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Annette Lopez
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Rosemarie Sterling
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Lisa James
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Cheryl Levin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
2.60
3
AnaElena Multach
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.54
3
Helen Picard
26W–37L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.