Teams

KBrannock/TFunderburk (Weddington)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-26vs SGraham (Park Road)Won 40
W#1 DoublesNancy Klug / Julie Alexander vs Anna Hilton / Julie VanOlden6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKristy Brannock vs Tammillye Ward6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Gibson / Kelley Montroy vs Mia Delmontagne / Lauren Mulcahy6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTeneika Funderburk / Anna McLaughlin vs Vibha Shankar / Kendra May6-2, 6-4
2022-04-19vs CChildress (Queens)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKristy Brannock / Nancy Klug vs Carol Childress / Xersalyn Threet6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTeneika Funderburk vs Jane Sickles2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAMY SAFIR / Allyson Dantino vs Huiying Cui / Xin Chen2-6, 1-6
2022-04-14vs SWhitney (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKristy Brannock / Teneika Funderburk vs Karol Kreshon / Dana Ferguson6-3, 6-2
2022-04-12vs TRamsay (Life Time)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAMY SAFIR / Julie Alexander vs Tammy Ramsay / Pamela Burks6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelley Montroy / Teneika Funderburk vs Stacey Reinhardt / Dorian Dipangrazio7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristy Brannock / Bobbie McManus vs Erin Bloomberg / Bilan Mo1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-29vs HPigg/MJones (PPRSC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAMY SAFIR / Diana Gasparro vs Kathleen Johnstone / Heather Rhyne3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTeneika Funderburk / Kelley Montroy vs Tiffany Kopittke / Emily Pease5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBobbie McManus / Allyson Dantino vs Holly McClure / Caroline Sjogren4-6, 3-6
2022-03-15vs SFloyd/DO'Connor (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAMY SAFIR / Nancy Klug vs Lori Chriscoe / Ruth di Stefano1-6, 0-6
2022-03-01vs SGraham (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gibson / AMY SAFIR vs Kendra May / Sophie Graham4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTeneika Funderburk vs Tammillye Ward4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTamara Gallagher / Michele Kelly vs Mitchell Kelling / Brooke Leonnig6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-22vs CChildress (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKristy Brannock / Nancy Klug vs Xersalyn Threet / Kristen Oliver6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Alexander / Diana Gasparro vs Wendy Parker / Xin Chen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTeneika Funderburk / Anna McLaughlin vs Jane Sickles / Keri Cantrell4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kristy Brannock
usually #1 Singles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Anna McLaughlin
published 4
3.48
Tamara Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
AMY SAFIR
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.44
Kelley Montroy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Diana Gasparro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Nancy Klug
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.33
Kathleen O'Donnell
published
Allyson Dantino
published 3.5
3.21
Kathy King
published
3.12
Teneika Funderburk
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Michele Kelly
published
2.92
Bobbie McManus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Klug + Kristy Brannock261854% games+3.3% vs expected
AMY SAFIR + Tamara Gallagher5649% games+2.9% vs expected
Nancy Klug + AMY SAFIR211455% games+2.0% vs expected
Tamara Gallagher + Kelley Montroy10752% games+1.3% vs expected
AMY SAFIR + Kelley Montroy9262% gamesnot enough data
Teneika Funderburk + Anna McLaughlin3744% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Klug + Bobbie McManus4176% gamesnot enough data
AMY SAFIR + Diana Gasparro1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristy Brannock
195W–70L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Anna McLaughlin
34W–74L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Tamara Gallagher
248W–148L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
AMY SAFIR
191W–93L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Kelley Montroy
138W–99L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Diana Gasparro
64W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Nancy Klug
148W–104L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Kathleen O'Donnell
33W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Allyson Dantino
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy King
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Teneika Funderburk
90W–111L career · 7 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Michele Kelly
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Bobbie McManus
36W–54L career · 6 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.