Teams

Hagood3.5/META

2026 Adult 40 & Over-META · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-30vs Cox/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesPam Mobley / Marcia Sentell vs Dana Wenzell / Ju Mo4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesShannon Hinkle vs Sarah LaGuardia2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Dimona / Anita Jilton vs Lynne Little / Jane Dean3-6, 4-6
2026-04-19vs Cox/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Warner / Makie Kordamiri vs Holli Cox / Anneke Self6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnita Jilton vs Ju Mo2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJoan Hagood / Robin Dimona vs Jane Dean / Jan Goodsell7-6, 6-3
2026-04-12vs Cox/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesPam Mobley / Sandra Cook vs Dana Wenzell / Rachel Fogg4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobin Dimona / Theresa Boyd vs Kirsten Hoskins / Jane Dean6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoan Hagood / Annette Clemons vs Anneke Self / Holli Cox6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-04-06vs Cox/METAWon 31
W#1 DoublesGail Archer / Marcia Sentell vs Lynne Little / Dana Wenzell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShannon Hinkle vs Ju Mo1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnnette Clemons / Sandra Cook vs Jean Swindle / Keo Jur6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPam Mobley / Mary Warner vs Anneke Self / Aileen Frazier6-2, 6-0
2026-03-23vs Cox/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Clemons / Marcia Sentell vs Kirsten Hoskins / Keo Jur6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesStacey McKenzie vs Holli Cox3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGail Archer / Shannon Hinkle vs Sarah LaGuardia / Mary Jo Sparrow7-6, 6-0
2026-03-22vs Cox/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnnette Clemons / Sandra Cook vs Lynne Little / Ju Mo6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGail Archer / Marcia Sentell vs Kirsten Hoskins / Jan Goodsell6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTheresa Boyd / Anita Jilton vs Holli Cox / Aileen Frazier6-2, 6-2
2026-03-15vs Cox/METAWon 31
W#1 DoublesGail Archer / Marcia Sentell vs Lynne Little / Sarah LaGuardia6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesShannon Hinkle vs Holli Cox3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Cook / Theresa Boyd vs Kirsten Hoskins / Jan Goodsell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnita Jilton / Mary Warner vs Aileen Frazier / Keo Jur6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hagood3.5/META43171125206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Marcia Sentell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Gail Archer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Robin Dimona
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Annette Clemons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Pam Mobley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Theresa Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Shannon Hinkle
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Anita Jilton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.92
Makie Kordamiri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Joan Hagood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey McKenzie
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Hagood + Anita Jilton2444% games−4.0% vs expected
Anita Jilton + Theresa Boyd224 matchesnot enough data
Gail Archer + Marcia Sentell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcia Sentell
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Gail Archer
13W–7L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Robin Dimona
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Annette Clemons
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Pam Mobley
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Theresa Boyd
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Shannon Hinkle
20W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Anita Jilton
36W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
Makie Kordamiri
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Joan Hagood
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
Stacey McKenzie
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.