← Teams

IRV-Knott/Burkhart

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Deborah Naugler
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.98
Rebecca Martinez Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.35
Sharon Loomis-Malin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Renee Schwartz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Erin Rothrock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.14
Blythe Knott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Heather Selis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Lori Vranizan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Mary Logsdon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results9 ties
2019-04-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRebecca Martinez Griffin / Sharon Loomis-Malin vs Lily Looi / Theresa Berry6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBlythe Knott / Wendy Weddle vs Andrea Yao / Laura Rundle2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacey Burkhart / Lori Vranizan vs Diane di Vito / Shari Levelle3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-03-31Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesErin Rothrock / Heather Selis vs Catherine Leedy / Kim Wright6-4, 6-2
2019-03-10Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesTerry Folen / Deborah Naugler vs Laura Laney / Lisa Littleton6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Burkhart / Mary Logsdon vs Jill Eilers / Marilyn von Bergen6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesHeather Selis vs Carol Robertson6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMargo Reifenrath / Lori Vranizan vs Catherine Leedy / Katy Marcy6-4, 6-2
2019-03-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTerry Folen / Mary Logsdon vs Amelia Moore / Mary Wittkop2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Selis / Laurie Sykes vs Sonia Bouchard / Kimberly Seely6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargo Reifenrath / Lori Vranizan vs Barbara Streeter / Holly H Jennings6-1, 6-4
2019-03-03Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesHeather Selis / Mary Logsdon vs Kayleen Mendenhall / Amy Murphy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Butler / Lori Vranizan vs Nancy Stecher / Brooke Thompson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2019-02-23Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesTerry Folen / Deborah Naugler vs Elizabeth Domagalski / Michele Hart6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Loomis-Malin / Wendy Weddle vs Amelia Moore / Sandie Yamauchi6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2019-02-17Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesBlythe Knott / Sharon Loomis-Malin vs Crystal Miller / Nancy Grove6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Logsdon / Stacey Burkhart vs Sharon Reese / Susan Rolfe6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWendy Weddle / Renee Schwartz vs Jan Funkhouser / Ellen Mulherin6-1, 6-1
2019-01-19Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRebecca Martinez Griffin / Deborah Naugler vs Toni Eastwood / Cathy Zagunis6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBlythe Knott / Terry Folen vs Jennifer Potter / Susan Eldridge6-2, 7-6
2018-12-07Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesAdam Rothert / Rebecca Martinez Griffin vs Kelly Mohr / Steve Vanderploeg6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Deborah Naugler
98W–63L career
5%95%0%
4.07
4.5
Rebecca Martinez Griffin
96W–58L career
19%81%0%
3.98
3.5
Sharon Loomis-Malin
60W–33L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Renee Schwartz
23W–21L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3
Erin Rothrock
37W–19L career
0%41%59%
3.14
3.5
Blythe Knott
22W–48L career
11%89%0%
3.14
3
Heather Selis
35W–60L career
0%84%16%
2.97
3
Lori Vranizan
22W–36L career
6%87%7%
2.78
0
Mary Logsdon
32W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.