Teams

WTC - Poston 40 & Over 3.5 Women

2026 Dothan USTA Adult 40 & over Fall League · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-31vs DO- Crowley/DeckLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Edwards / Cathy Ogilvie vs Ashley Lee / Carlene Sessions7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarla Barnett vs Michelle Jones2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Bitney / Julia Johnson vs Carie Crowley / Kimberly Griger2-6, 1-6
2025-12-17vs DO- Crowley/DeckLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenny Nelson / Carla Barnett vs Angie Mcdaniel / Carlene Sessions5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesVicki Bitney vs Karelia Castillo0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Johnson / Carol Hundley vs Jessica Deck / Jessica Kelley2-6, 2-6
2025-12-10vs DO- Crowley/DeckLost 02
L#1 DoublesShea Turner / Jenny Nelson vs Carie Crowley / Leigh Cooper3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarla Barnett / Vicki Bitney vs Angela Bell / Kimberly Griger1-6, 0-6
2025-12-02vs DO- Crowley/DeckLost 02
L#1 SinglesAllison Edwards vs Helen Mendheim0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Ogilvie / Vicki Bitney vs Kimberly Griger / Jessica Deck2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DO- Crowley/Deck40151363
2WTC - Poston 40 & Over 3.5 Women0411530182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Carol Hundley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Margaret Poston
published
2.97
Carla Barnett
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Cathy Ogilvie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Allison Edwards
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Vicki Bitney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.74
Jenny Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Shea Turner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Ogilvie + Vicki Bitney0720% games−14.9% vs expected
Allison Edwards + Jenny Nelson2354% gamesnot enough data
Jenny Nelson + Carol Hundley3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Hundley
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Margaret Poston
19W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
3.5
Carla Barnett
0W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Cathy Ogilvie
1W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Allison Edwards
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Vicki Bitney
4W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.86
Jenny Nelson
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Shea Turner
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.