Teams

Cryan Brothers

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 3.05 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-05vs In CrowdLost 03
L#2 DoublesChris Angermayer / Ernest Blackwelder vs Michael Leman / John Tesnohlidek5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMike Howard vs Conner Hall2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPeter Mcsorley / Anthony Olbrich vs Russell Leininger / Daniel Waldram2-6, 1-6
2023-06-29vs ETC 3.0 MenLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Sparks / Anthony Olbrich vs Adam Panitch / Caleb Roope2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Angermayer / Burl Ackerman vs Owen Hammond / William Merrick2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNick Koontz / Daniel Meltzer vs Jorge Chepote / Bruce Clark6-3, 7-5
2023-06-28vs ETC 3.0 MenLost 02
L#2 DoublesWoody Kessler / Eric Schneider vs Owen Hammond / William Merrick0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBurl Ackerman / Peter Mcsorley vs Jorge Chepote / Bruce Clark0-6, 0-6
2023-06-21vs In CrowdWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnthony Olbrich / Peter Mcsorley vs Bill Reil / John Tesnohlidek6-3, 6-3
2023-06-19vs ETC 3.0 MenLost 01
L#1 SinglesMike Howard vs Caleb Roope1-6, 3-6
2023-06-12vs In CrowdLost 12
W#1 SinglesBurl Ackerman vs Parker Balbach6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMike Howard / Michael Johnson vs Daniel Waldram / Russell Leininger5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnthony Olbrich / Eric Schneider vs John Tesnohlidek / Michael Leman3-6, 2-6
2023-05-31vs In CrowdLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Johnson / Ernest Blackwelder vs Bill Reil / Conner Hall3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBurl Ackerman / Peter Mcsorley vs John Rutten-Turner / Ken Ding3-6, 2-6
2023-05-24vs ETC 3.0 MenLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Mcsorley / Michael Johnson vs William Merrick / Mark Stillman1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Bryan Lawley
published 3.5
3.17
Michael Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Matthew Rubio
published 3
2.99
Eric Schneider
published 3
2.83
Ernest Blackwelder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Burl Ackerman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Daniel Meltzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Sparks
published 3
2.67
Chris Angermayer
published 3
2.52
Matt Koehl
published 3
2.25
Anthony Olbrich
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Frederick Noble
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Ken Hosac
published
Mike Howard
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nick Koontz
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patrick Purdy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Mcsorley
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Woody Kessler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Angermayer + Matthew Rubio2737% games−0.5% vs expected
Nick Koontz + Matt Koehl81249% gamesnot enough data
Michael Johnson + Matthew Rubio0829% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Rubio + Anthony Olbrich4447% gamesnot enough data
Woody Kessler + Eric Schneider0828% gamesnot enough data
Ken Hosac + Ernest Blackwelder2443% gamesnot enough data
Eric Schneider + Anthony Olbrich0642% gamesnot enough data
David Sparks + Matthew Rubio3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryan Lawley
55W–36L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
Michael Johnson
43W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Matthew Rubio
77W–78L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Eric Schneider
16W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Ernest Blackwelder
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Burl Ackerman
10W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Daniel Meltzer
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
David Sparks
46W–91L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Chris Angermayer
52W–73L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Matt Koehl
57W–73L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.52
3
Anthony Olbrich
13W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.25
Frederick Noble
6W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ken Hosac
18W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Howard
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nick Koontz
27W–38L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patrick Purdy
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Mcsorley
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Woody Kessler
7W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.