Teams

MDuncker-HVCC

2025 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-26vs EBlack-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesKristen Ingle / Melinda Duncker vs Olga Stephens / Linda Blevins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHadley Nixon / Stacey Smith vs Julie Brigham / Lynelle Clark2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGina Goldthwaite / Sterling Ingui vs Christine Burr / Hope Graney1-6, 3-6
2025-09-19vs KTravis-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Ingle / Kelly Moore vs Linda Chuang / Joyce Robinson4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMelanie Biese / Melinda Duncker vs Krissy Anderson / Colleen Davis2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Jernigan / Courtney Sheldon vs Blake Ellis / Kelly Travis2-6, 2-6
2025-09-12vs KJohnson-UNCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelanie Biese / Melinda Duncker vs Anne Cable / Kate Harshbarger3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHadley Nixon / Joanie Preyer vs Kelly Johnson / Rebekah Farris3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Smith / Sterling Ingui vs Patty Hubbard / LAURIE KIEFFER3-6, 1-6
2025-09-05vs HHutchins-CHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesGina Goldthwaite / Deborah Hertzog vs Crissy Haley / Joli Stockwell0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Bronico / Melinda Duncker vs Danielle Iordanou-Lille / Carla Sevilla5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKelly Moore / Hadley Nixon vs Keri A Clark / Elizabeth Richards3-6, 6-7
2025-08-29vs HHutchins-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelanie Biese / Kelly Moore vs Crissy Haley / Kate Souto1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Bronico / Hadley Nixon vs Carla Sevilla / Joli Stockwell2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoanie Preyer / Gina Goldthwaite vs Catherine Burgess / Mignon Lunsford6-0, 7-5
2025-08-22vs JRosen-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelinda Duncker / Kelly Moore vs Jennifer Rosen / Monica Jenkins6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Bronico / Joanie Preyer vs Laurel Zdanski / Sarah Sapeta6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacey Smith / Deborah Hertzog vs Sara Moody / Diane Koenigshofer1-6, 2-6
2025-08-15vs LHsu-HRLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelanie Biese / Sarah Bronico vs Lisa Hsu / Sara Lawrence5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGina Goldthwaite / Kelly Moore vs Tara Russell / Rebecca Walsh1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelinda Duncker / Valerie Michael vs Amanda Pierce / Barbie McGarrah3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-01vs EBlack-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelanie Biese / Kelly Moore vs Heather Roberts / Julie Karg5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesStacey Smith / Melinda Duncker vs Christine Burr / Jennifer Taylor0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSarah Bronico / Kelly Jernigan vs Olga Stephens / Hope Graney3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Hadley Nixon
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Ingle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Gina Goldthwaite
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Sarah Bronico
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Melanie Biese
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.06
Deborah Hertzog
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Melinda Duncker
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Joanie Preyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Valerie Michael
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Sterling Ingui
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Courtney Sheldon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Biese + Kristen Ingle5547% games+5.0% vs expected
Hadley Nixon + Kristen Ingle4351% gamesnot enough data
Hadley Nixon + Melinda Duncker5157% gamesnot enough data
Joanie Preyer + Hadley Nixon314 matchesnot enough data
Joanie Preyer + Sarah Bronico303 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Biese + Melinda Duncker123 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Hertzog + Valerie Michael123 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Duncker + Sarah Bronico213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hadley Nixon
77W–65L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kristen Ingle
60W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Gina Goldthwaite
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Sarah Bronico
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.10
Melanie Biese
19W–23L career · 9 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Deborah Hertzog
37W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Melinda Duncker
80W–62L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Joanie Preyer
20W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Valerie Michael
58W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Sterling Ingui
43W–79L career · 7 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Courtney Sheldon
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.