Teams

Azlin-GGCC

2025 Combo 18 & Over-DLT · Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-03vs Joel-CCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharisse Oberle / Shelby Ballinger vs Lane Lyon / Robin Toler6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeslie Branning / Mandy Hensley vs Sara Hester / Jenifer Davidson6-1, 4-2
2025-10-01vs Joel-CCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Cadenhead Glasco / Madalyne Wolfe Johnson vs Sara Hester / Chloe Darden6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMelody Taylor / Haley Thomas vs Lane Purvis / Robin Toler6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Siebert / Liz Vickers vs Kaley Joel / Teresa Reed7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-22vs Joel-CCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesGinny Cochran / Shelby Ballinger vs Lane Lyon / Frances Varner2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharisse Oberle / Liz Vickers vs Avery Johnson / Lane Purvis3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMelody Taylor / Haley Thomas vs Chloe Darden / Teresa Reed6-0, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Azlin-GGCC5113514121
2Morgan-CCC339921168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Charisse Oberle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.21
Amanda Azlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Teri Jernigan
published
2.98
Madalyne Wolfe Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Mary Cadenhead Glasco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Ginny Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Shelby Ballinger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.80
Liz Vickers
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Melissa Siebert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Haley Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Leslie Branning
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mandy Hensley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melody Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madalyne Wolfe Johnson + Shelby Ballinger404 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Azlin + Shelby Ballinger404 matchesnot enough data
Shelby Ballinger + Haley Thomas303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charisse Oberle
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Amanda Azlin
58W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Teri Jernigan
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Madalyne Wolfe Johnson
14W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Mary Cadenhead Glasco
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
Ginny Cochran
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Shelby Ballinger
50W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.83
Liz Vickers
23W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
Melissa Siebert
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Haley Thomas
10W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Branning
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mandy Hensley
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melody Taylor
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.